ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : Article examines whether the MLI Principal Purpose Test has domestic effect under Section 90(1) following Nestlé SA and Sky High ...
Corporate Law : The article argues that failure to comply before the AO or CIT(A) can lead to adverse assessments, as higher forums generally cann...
Income Tax : ITAT held that Section 54 exemption must be examined separately for each residential house sold. Aggregating gains from multiple t...
Income Tax : ITAT held that delayed filing of Form 10B cannot defeat Section 11 exemption if the audit report is available before processing un...
Income Tax : Smt. Ranjana Kumari/Kalta Vs DCIT/ACIT (Central) (ITAT Chandigarh) The appeals involved three assessees belonging to the Kalta Gro...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : Learn about hybrid hearing guidelines of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Indore Bench, effective from October 9, 2023, offeri...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune allowed Section 80P(2)(d) deduction on interest from deposits with Cooperative Banks, following its earlier decisions in...
Income Tax : ITAT Panaji allowed Section 80P(2)(a)(i) deduction, holding the assessee remained a cooperative society as it had no RBI banking l...
Income Tax : ITAT Kolkata quashed the assessment, holding the ACIT lacked pecuniary jurisdiction under CBDT Instruction No. 1/2011 where the re...
Income Tax : ITAT Jaipur dismissed the appeal against a Section 148A(3) order, holding it was not appealable under Section 253 of the Income-ta...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi deleted a Section 69 addition based on Omaxe search material, holding third-party Excel data without cross-examination ...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Income Tax : Bhagyalaxmi Conclave Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) In the remand report, the AO clearly stated that notice u/s 143(2) of the Ac...
ITAT Indore remanded a Section 271(1)(c) penalty appeal after holding that the CIT(A) wrongly adjudicated it as an assessment appeal, contrary to Section 250(6).
ITAT Kolkata deleted the addition on cash deposits after holding that amounts collected for DMT/IMPS transactions were explained through commission agency records.
ITAT Kolkata held that interest on surplus funds deposited with banks by a credit co-operative society qualifies for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i).
Mumbai ITAT deleted Section 270A penalty after Bombay HC set aside the Section 148 notice and proceedings issued by the Jurisdictional AO.
ITAT Kolkata dismissed the Revenue’s appeals and held that a consistently followed stock valuation method could not be disturbed without rejecting the books.
Mumbai ITAT deleted a ₹1.62 crore Section 69A addition after finding the AO relied only on an investigation report without independent inquiry.
ITAT Jaipur deleted Section 271(1)(c) penalty after holding that voluntary disclosure of LTCG in a Section 148 return did not amount to concealment.
ITAT Jaipur deleted Section 271(1)(c) penalty, holding that an estimated addition on alleged bogus purchases without findings of concealment could not sustain penalty.
ITAT Bangalore deleted Section 270A penalty, holding that ad hoc expense disallowance and TDS disallowance did not establish misreporting under Section 270A(9).
ITAT Delhi held that maintenance charges under separate agreements are business income, while interest on replacement loans remains deductible under Section 24(b).
