ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : ITAT upholds penalty against taxpayer for cash repayment of loans, contravening Section 269T of Income-tax Act. Explore implicatio...
Income Tax : In a landmark ruling, ITAT Mumbai grants Vodafone the right to claim depreciation on goodwill, clarifying that amendments by Finan...
Income Tax : Explore the latest in international taxation: from judicial precedents to regulatory changes. Dive into cases, form updates, and M...
Income Tax : Explore recent ITAT judgment in Rakesh Kr. Jha vs. ITO, delving into interpretation of Sections 271A and 271B, highlighting confli...
Income Tax : ITAT held that income for purpose of ascertaining ceiling on the basis of book profit, the profit shall be as appearing in the P...
Income Tax : Learn about hybrid hearing guidelines of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Indore Bench, effective from October 9, 2023, offeri...
Income Tax : Supreme Court of India has recently issued an order requiring all revenue appeals before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ...
Income Tax : At present appeals are fixed in routine and may take one to two years period even for first hearing. it is humbly submitted that t...
Income Tax : CBI Registers a Case against Accountant Member, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) on the Allegations of Possessing Disproportio...
Income Tax : Law Minister Shri Ravi Shankar Prasad launches 'itat e-dwar', an e-filing portal of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. Portal will ena...
Income Tax : Discover the case of Brahmaputra Property Hub Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Guwahati) regarding Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, ...
Income Tax : Explore the case of DCIT Vs. Bengal Brahmaputra Realty Limited (ITAT Guwahati) and understand the significance of incriminating ma...
Income Tax : ITAT Chennai held that rejection of application in Form No. 10AB for seeking approval u/s. 80G(5)(iii) of the Income Tax Act by tr...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held that that cash sales that is already offered as income cannot be taxed in the grab of inflation sales to cover up ...
Income Tax : Detailed analysis of Chandarani N. Goyal Vs ITO case where Mumbai ITAT ruled that money received as a security deposit, if refunde...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Income Tax : Bhagyalaxmi Conclave Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) In the remand report, the AO clearly stated that notice u/s 143(2) of the Ac...
Income Tax : Office Order No. 08 of 2021 Post facto approval of the Competent Authority is hereby conveyed for extension of term of ad-hoc appo...
Income Tax : In continuation of the SOP (Standard Operating Procedure) dated 01.06.2020 the hearing of cases at 'ITAT Chandigarh Benches from 0...
Discover the case of Brahmaputra Property Hub Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Guwahati) regarding Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Learn why detailed inquiry matters.
Explore the case of DCIT Vs. Bengal Brahmaputra Realty Limited (ITAT Guwahati) and understand the significance of incriminating material in income tax assessments for completed or unabated years.
ITAT Chennai held that rejection of application in Form No. 10AB for seeking approval u/s. 80G(5)(iii) of the Income Tax Act by treating it as time barred under gist that CBDT circular no. 22/2022 dated 01.11.2022 didn’t provide extension of time limit is unjustified.
ITAT Delhi held that that cash sales that is already offered as income cannot be taxed in the grab of inflation sales to cover up demonetization currency. Accordingly, addition u/s. 68 of the Income Tax Act directed to be deleted.
Detailed analysis of Chandarani N. Goyal Vs ITO case where Mumbai ITAT ruled that money received as a security deposit, if refunded, is not taxable under section 56(2)(vii)(a) of the Income Tax Act.
In Chandresh P. Thakker vs National Faceless Assessment Centre case, Mumbai ITAT allows commission expenses if supported by evidence of services rendered by commission agents and income shown in return.
Mumbai ITAT clarifies that action under section 153C can’t be based solely on survey material. Detailed analysis of the case and its implications.
ITAT Mumbai overturns AO’s addition of Rs. 80 Lakh against mere Rs. 50,000 share capital infusion, ruling in favor of taxpayer’s proof of subscriber genuineness.
Learn about the ruling by ITAT Kolkata stating no deduction can be claimed if employees’ contributions deducted from salaries were not paid to PF & ESI accounts. Full order analysis provided.
Indian Oil Employees Welfare Cooperative Society Ltd. vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) case discusses the eligibility of cooperative society interest income under section 80P. Read the detailed analysis and conclusion.
