Company Law : Explore four legal methods to voluntarily wind up a private company in India, including summary winding up, strike-off, and liquid...
Corporate Law : Liability pertaining to personal guarantors under IBC, 2016 has evolved significantly with legal framework extending its reach to ...
Corporate Law : There’s a lack of real space to unpack the inappropriateness of certain aspects of IBBI’s 2025 reforms is difficult: the refor...
Corporate Law : Learn how secured creditors can relinquish or realize their security interest during liquidation under IBC, including timelines an...
Corporate Law : The initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under Sections 7-10 of the IBC involves different creditors and p...
Corporate Law : IBBI's First Appellate Authority dismisses Ravinder Aggarwal's RTI appeal seeking details on MSA Developers' resolution plan imple...
Corporate Law : India's IBC shows significant recovery rates. 8,000+ CIRPs initiated, with 3,485 debtors rescued. Learn about amendments & reforms...
Corporate Law : Overview of IBC 2016's impact, amendments, and government's stance on further changes, including flat registration in insolvency c...
Corporate Law : Clarification on share certificate claims under Rs. 5 lakh, legal heir acceptance, and applicant authenticity measures by the Inve...
Corporate Law : Government clarifies the status of Barshi Textile Mills under IBC 2016, addressing worker payments, company status, and cooperativ...
Company Law : NCLAT Delhi held that initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) for failure to honour repayment obligation just...
Company Law : NCLAT Chennai held that initiation of the IRP proceeding u/s. 95 of Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 against personal guarantor ...
Corporate Law : NCLAT Chennai held that post completion of liquidation process and property of Corporate Debtor is handed over to Successful Aucti...
Corporate Law : NCLT Mumbai held that imposition of moratorium u/s. 14 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 for the acquisition of land by Mumb...
Corporate Law : Thus, we do not find any error in the impugned order for the purpose of interference, therefore, the present appeal is found to be...
Corporate Law : BBI suspends IP Vikas Prakash Gupta for one year for receiving fees designated for a separate support agency, violating transparen...
Corporate Law : IBBI's First Appellate Authority addressed an RTI appeal regarding information on the Institution of Valuers (IOV) and its foundat...
Corporate Law : Information Commission disposes of an appeal regarding delayed RTI response from CPIO, emphasizing adherence to statutory timeline...
Corporate Law : IBBI disciplinary order suspends IP Jitendrakumar Yadav for 1 year for IBC violations in Dilip Chhabria & Maha Urja cases, citing ...
Corporate Law : IBBI's First Appellate Authority dismisses an RTI appeal, clarifying that public authorities are not required to collate data in a...
IBBI’s First Appellate Authority rejects Arush Mittal’s RTI appeal for RP’s complaint reply, citing third-party personal information exemption.
IBBI’s First Appellate Authority dismisses multiple appeals by Shashi Agarwal, citing abuse of RTI Act through repetitive and frivolous queries.
IBBI’s First Appellate Authority dismisses Neeraj Gutgutia’s RTI appeal regarding e-auction eligibility and eBKray’s rights, citing information nature.
NCLT Mumbai held that application u/s. 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code [IBC] after three years of MSME Council Awards is beyond limitation as per Article 137 of the Limitation Act. Accordingly, application dismissed as barred by limitation.
NCLAT Delhi held that appeal against an order of NCLT initiating insolvency resolution process of personal guarantor lays to NCLAT. Thus, personal guarantor eligible to file an appeal u/s. 61 of IBC against order issued u/s. 100.
NCLT Kolkata held that One Time Settlement proposal given by Corporate Debtor to Financial Creditor is a clear acknowledgment of debt and default. Hence, application filed by Financial Creditor u/s. 7 of IBC for initiating CIRP against S R Timber Products Private Limited admitted.
Discrepancies in financials prompted the Appellant to seek clarifications from Personal Guarantors – Respondents No. 2 and 3, and the late Mr. Bajrang Dass Aggarwal, who provided explanations on 25.02.2020.
NCLT Mumbai held that invocation of provisions of section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code against corporate guarantor not maintainable as financial creditor not able to establish invocation of corporate guarantee.
NCLT Mumbai held that the private sale has to be conducted by the liquidator in a manner so as to maximize the realizations from the sale of assets. Since strategy to maximize realisation from sale of assets absent.
NCLAT Delhi held that penalty under section 27(b) of the Competition Act, 2002 imposable since Google has abused its dominant position and has violated Section 4(2)(a)(i) and 4(2)(e) of the Competition Act, 2002.
