Goods and Services Tax : The Bombay High Court ruled that exports classified as "restricted" remain eligible for RoDTEP benefits when carried out with spec...
Goods and Services Tax : The Karnataka High Court ruled that the time limit for filing a waiver application under Section 128A is directory, not mandatory....
Goods and Services Tax : The Punjab and Haryana High Court held that a GST order passed without considering the assessee's reply and without recording reas...
Goods and Services Tax : The Delhi High Court held that the amended limitation provision under Section 54 cannot be applied retrospectively to deny refund ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Delhi High Court held that uploading an SCN only under the 'Additional Notices' tab without effective communication does not a...
Goods and Services Tax : A representation seeks extension of the GSTAT appeal filing deadline to 31 December 2026, citing persistent technical issues on th...
Goods and Services Tax : The Advocates Tax Bar Association has requested extension of the GSTAT appeal filing deadline to 31 December 2026, citing persiste...
Goods and Services Tax : A GST Bar Association has sought a three-month extension for filing GSTAT appeals, citing procedural complexities and evolving fil...
Goods and Services Tax : Stakeholders identified persistent issues in GST registration, cancellations, and refund processing affecting MSMEs. The consultat...
Goods and Services Tax : Haryana recorded the highest State GST growth rate in India at 22% in May 2026. The achievement is attributed to strong tax admini...
Goods and Services Tax : The High Court ruled that rejecting condonation requests through mere communication without a speaking order is invalid. Authoriti...
Goods and Services Tax : The Ministry of Coal hails the GST Council's reform, which removes the ₹400/ tonne Compensation Cess and raises the GST rate to ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Andhra Pradesh High Court has quashed a GST registration cancellation notice, ruling that the absence of a mandatory Document ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Delhi High Court ruled that Xilinx India Technology Services Pvt. Ltd. is entitled to interest on its delayed GST refund under...
Goods and Services Tax : West Bengal AAAR upholds PVC raincoat classification under HSN 3926 (plastics) with an 18% GST, affirming they are not woven texti...
CA, CS, CMA : KSCAA has urged the Government to extend the GSTAT appeal filing deadline by three months, citing technical glitches, procedural a...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTN has made Ship-to GSTIN conditionally mandatory in specified e-Invoice and e-Way Bill workflows. The change introduces stricte...
Goods and Services Tax : Haryana has directed officers to send GST show cause notices and demand orders by registered or speed post in addition to portal-b...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTAT instructed scrutiny officers not to raise defects where appellants have uploaded the required documents in prescribed form. ...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTAT Mumbai Bench has officially commenced functioning, making it mandatory for taxpayers within its jurisdiction to file appeals...
Authorities arrested the key accused for orchestrating fake ITC claims and fictitious export transactions. The case highlights strict enforcement against large-scale GST refund fraud using shell entities.
GST notices are commonly issued due to mismatches, incorrect filings, and missing information in returns. The content highlights the need for a structured system to manage and respond effectively.
Authorities uncovered fraudulent ITC claims exceeding ₹8 crore without actual supply of goods. The ruling highlights that ITC is inadmissible where the supply chain is non-existent or broken.
Limitation start from date when Impugned Order in Form DRC 07 uploaded on portal and not from date of detailed order: Allahabad High Court
The case highlights that summons lacking details of the underlying inquiry violate procedural fairness. It underscores the need for transparency to ensure lawful and non-arbitrary GST enforcement.
The issue was denial of ITC transfer due to different State registrations of entities. The Court ruled that no such restriction exists under Section 18(3) and Rule 41, making the portal condition invalid. The key takeaway is that statutory provisions override administrative limitations.
GSTN clarified that system-calculated interest for February 2026 was incorrectly reflected in March returns due to a technical issue. Taxpayers must recompute and update the correct interest using the portal feature.
The Court ruled that interest cannot be imposed in adjudication if it was not specified in the show cause notice. The decision reinforces that authorities cannot exceed the scope of the original notice under GST law.
The issue involved taxation of intermediary services based on supplier location. The amendment shifts place of supply to recipient location, enabling export benefits and zero-rating.
The Orissa High Court held that supplier non-existence cannot automatically imply fraud by the recipient. Independent evidence of intent is mandatory for invoking Section 74.
