competition act judiciary-2

Karnataka HC dismisses Flipkart Plea challenging CCI probe

Flipkart Internet Pvt Ltd Vs Competition Commission of India (Karnataka High Court)

Flipkart Internet Pvt Ltd Vs Competition Commission of India (Karnataka High Court) In the considered opinion of this Court, the CCI certainly have a jurisdiction to take appropriate steps to curb the anti competitive practices and a detailed mechanism is provided under the Act itself to ensure that no anti competitive practices are under...

Read More

CCI allowed investigation against Flipkart, Amazon for alleged Anti-Competitive agreements

Amazon Seller Services Private Limited Vs Competition Commission of India (Karnataka High Court)

Competition Commission of India had allowed to investigate against Flipkart and Amazon for alleged involvement in Anti-competitive Agreements. An order directing investigation be supported by 'some reasoning' (CCI Vs. SAIL para 97), which the Commission had fulfilled. Therefore, it would be unwise to prejudge the issues raised by Amazon a...

Read More

SC dismisses application alleging cartelization & anti-competitive practices by Uber & Ola

Samir Agarwal Vs Competition Commission of India & Ors (Supreme Court of India)

SC held that Ola and Uber did not facilitate cartelization or anti-competitive practices between drivers as the drivers were independent individuals who acted independently of each other, therefore, section 3 of the CCI Act would not apply. ...

Read More

Motor Vehicle Compensation can also be Granted to Children & Parents

The New India Assurance Company Limited Vs. Smt. Somwati And Others (Supreme Court)

Supreme Court in a recent ruling has observed that in the Motor Accident Compensation Claims, that the children and family would also be authorized for compensation under 'Loss of consortium' in claims of Motor Accident under the Act....

Read More

CCI dismisses Plea Alleging Dominant Position abuse by Whatsapp & Facebook

Harshita Chawla Vs. WhatsApp Inc. & Facebook Inc. (Competition Commission of India)

Harshita Chawla Vs. WhatsApp Inc. & Facebook Inc. (Competition Commission of India) As regards the allegation of leveraging, the Commission does not agree with the Informant for reasons cited supra while dealing with the allegation under Section 4(2)(d) of the Act. The Informant has contended that WhatsApp will leverage its dominance ...

Read More

CCI closes complaint against West Bengal lotteries directorate, stockist

XYZ Vs Directorate of State Lotteries (Competition Commission of India)

XYZ Vs Directorate of State Lotteries (Competition Commission of India) Competition Commission has closed a complaint alleging unfair business practices by the Directorate of State Lotteries, West Bengal, and West Bengal Lottery Stockists Syndicate. Full Text of the order of Competition Commission of India 1. The present Information has b...

Read More

Suo Moto NCLAT Delhi order under Insolvency, Competition & Company Law

Suo Moto (NCLAT Delhi)

That the period of lockdown ordered by the Central Government and the State Governments including the period as may be extended either in whole or part of the country, where the registered office of the Corporate Debtor may be located...

Read More
Posted Under: Corporate Law | |

AMMA violates anti-competitive conduct: NCLAT Delhi

Association of Malayalam Movie Artists Vs Competition Commission of India & Ors. (NCLAT Delhi)

‘Association of Malayalam Movie Artistes’ (AMMA), Film Employees Federation of Kerala’ (FEFKA), ‘FEFKA Director’s Union’ and ‘FEFKA Production Executive’s Union’ and their office bearers were found to be liable under Section 48 for violation of anti-competitive conduct....

Read More
Posted Under: Corporate Law | |

Sanction of Walmart’s acquisition of Flipkart by CCI was justified

Confederation of All India Traders Vs Competition Commission of India (NCLAT)

: In absence of any prime facie opinion framed, that the combination of Walmart-Flipkart was likely to cause or had caused appreciable adverse effect on the competition within the relevant market in India, the sanction of of Walmart’s acquisition of Flipkart by Competition Commission of India (CCI) was justified....

Read More
Posted Under: Corporate Law | |

Rounding Off Railway Fares Prima Facie Abuse of Dominance: CCI

Mr. Meet Shah Vs Union of India, Ministry of Railway (Competition Commissioner of India)

Mr. Meet Shah Vs Union of India, Ministry of Railway (Competition Commissioner of India) Railway and IRCTC (Opposite Parties) have not been able to convince the Commission as to why the policy of rounding off of actual base fares to the next higher multiple of Rs.5 is applicable to the sale of online tickets, when […]...

Read More

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (5,690)
Company Law (7,672)
Custom Duty (8,723)
DGFT (4,626)
Excise Duty (4,527)
Fema / RBI (4,815)
Finance (5,183)
Income Tax (38,444)
SEBI (4,132)
Service Tax (3,778)

Search Posts by Date

September 2021
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930