Capital Gain judiciary-2

Sec. 54 allowable on gain invested up to due date of filing revised ITR

Rajendra Pal Verma Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)

In the case before us was entitled to claim exemption u/s. 54 to the extent he had invested towards the purchase of the new residential property under consideration upto the date of filing of his revised return of income under Sec. 139(5) i. e. on 15. 11. 2014....

Read More

Exemption U/s. 54F available on capital gain on sale of depreciable assets

Income Tax Officer Vs Smt. Jaya Deepak Bhavnani (ITAT Mumbai)

ITO Vs Smt. Jaya Deepak Bhavnani (ITAT Mumbai) Legal fiction created in Section 50 is to deem capital gain as short term capital gain and not to deem an asset as short term capital asset and therefore it cannot be said that Section 50 converts long term capital asset into short term capital asset and […]...

Read More

Period of holding to count from the date of provisional allotment letter

DCIT Vs Smt. Jennifer Chakraborty (ITAT Kolkata)

The word held used in section 2(14) implies right over a capital asset. In the instant case, right over the property was held by assessee for the period of 36 months, by paying first installment and builder issued a provisional letter of allotment and from that period, assessee had been enjoying legal right over the said property. ...

Read More

No deduction u/s 48 for clearing off mortgage created by assessee prior to transfer of land

Smt. D. Zeenath Vs ITO (Madras High Court)

Smt. D. Zeenath Vs ITO (Madras High Court) Conclusion: Assessee created mortgage after acquiring the property and clearing off of the mortgage debt prior to transfer of the property would not entitle her to claim deduction under section 48 as there was only a mere application by the owners themselves of the profits realized on […]...

Read More

Brought forward long-term capital loss and brought forward business loss can be set off against STCG computed U/s. 50

ITO Vs M/s Smart Sensors & Transducers Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai)

ITO Vs M/s Smart Sensors & Transducers Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai) As regards to set off of business loss against gain on sale of depreciable asset of factory building by the assessee, we find that the co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal in the case of M/s. Raj Shree Roadlines vs ITO (ITA No.1627/Mum/2012) for A.Y . […]...

Read More

S. 50C Addition without reference to Valuation Officer not justified

Jayashree Kothari Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)

Jayashree Kothari Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) Sec. 50C(2) enables the Assessing Officer to make a reference to the Valuation Officer. Whenever a reference is made by the AO to the Valuation Officer, such reference has to be construed as a reference made under sec. 16A(1) of the Wealth-tax Act. We have also carefully gone through […]...

Read More

Section 54EC Count Six month from additional stamp duty payment date: ITAT

Shri Anil Kumar Dulichand Vs ACIT-17 (ITAT Mumbai)

Date of transfer of property to compute the six-months period for the purpose of claiming deduction under section 54EC could not be taken from the date when the purchase agreement was registered because the transfer would complete after additional stamp duty to complete the process of registration was paid by assessee....

Read More

No Penalty for mere rejection of Sec 54F claim against tenancy right Sale

PCIT Vs Rasiklal M. Parikh (Bombay High Court)

The dispute between the Assessee and the Revenue was with reference to actual payment for purchase of the flat and whether when the Assessee had purchased one more flat, though contagious, could the Assessee claim exemption under Section 54F of the Act. ...

Read More

Transfer cannot be considered merely on the basis of registered agreement

Appasaheb Baburao Lonkar Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)

Appasaheb Baburao Lonkar Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Wherein the initial contract was between the parties on the ground that the assessee would get permission of other co-owners numbering about 13 so as to transfer immovable asset to the purchasers. This was the basic condition of the said agreement between the parties. Admittedly, the said permis...

Read More

Stock-in-trade transfers in the year in which sale deed gets executed

Shri Challa Ramakrishna Vs ACIT (ITAT Hyderabad)

ITAT held that Stock- in-trade can be considered as transferred only in the year in which the assessee has executed the sale deed transferring the stock-in-trade and not when the assessee has given stock-in-trade for joint development to the builder. As already held in the above cases, the provisions of section 2(47)(v) would apply only t...

Read More

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (4,146)
Company Law (4,737)
Custom Duty (7,278)
DGFT (3,931)
Excise Duty (4,195)
Fema / RBI (3,697)
Finance (3,893)
Income Tax (29,902)
SEBI (3,134)
Service Tax (3,452)

Search Posts by Date

June 2019
« May