Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Appellant Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai)
Appeal Number : Service Tax Appeal No. 40818 of 2014
Date of Judgement/Order : 15/09/2023
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Appellant Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai)

Introduction: In a significant legal battle between the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation and the Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai), the question of whether the hiring of space for advertisements on buses by the State Transport Corporation should be classified as an advertising agency service has been the center of debate. This article delves into the details of the case, the arguments presented by both parties, and the final decision reached by CESTAT Chennai.

Detailed Analysis: The case originated when the Central Excise officers conducted an investigation into the activities of the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (TSTC). They found that TSTC had been offering advertising space on its buses to various consumer brands and collecting fees for these advertisements. The revenue generated from these advertisements was categorized as ‘Non-Operational Revenue’ in their financial records.

Based on this investigation, a Show Cause Notice was issued to TSTC in September 2006, demanding service tax of Rs. 11,81,098 for the period from January 2002 to June 2006, along with interest and penalties. The adjudicating authority, after due legal process, confirmed the demand, resulting in a service tax liability of Rs. 7,93,321, in addition to interest and penalties, as per the provisions of the Finance Act, 1994. Commissioner (Appeals) also upheld this order, leading to the appeal before CESTAT Chennai.

The primary argument presented by TSTC was that they were a government undertaking in Tamil Nadu, providing transportation services to the public. They contended that the term “Advertisement Charges” used in their financial records was merely for easy identification and convenience. TSTC insisted that this terminology should not determine their classification as an advertising agency. According to TSTC, they only provided space on their buses for advertisers to display their advertisement boards. The actual making, preparation, display, or exhibition of advertisements was the responsibility of the advertisers themselves.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031