In respect of foreign payments, TDS u/s. 195 is quite a grey area of the Indian Income Tax Act (act).  Every payment to a non resident  is not liable for TDS u/s. 195.   A decision as to the coverage of any payment u/s. 195 requires  determination about taxability of income in the hands of NR recipient-  not only from the angle of  the act but also from the perspective of Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA).

Taxability of an income in India  in terms of DTAA depends upon the classification of income under the right clause of DTAA. In this regards, one finds that the scheme of classification of income in DTAAs is quite different from that is given in the Income Tax Act.  One such important classification is with respect to payment for professional services.  While in case of payment to a resident, all professional services related payments get classified u/s. 194J of the act for TDS purposes, in DTAA such payments may get classified as Fees for Technical Services or Business Income or Independent Personal services (IPS).

If a payment gets classified as  Fees for Technical Services, almost all DTAAs of India allows  the taxability of income in India, requiring thereby a TDS by the payer entity. However, if it is a payment for Independent Personal services, then it is taxable in India only in very limited cases and as such in majority of cases, payer does not have a liability of TDS. This difference in tax treatment makes it imperative to understand in detail the concept of Independent Personal services (IPS) as obtained in DTAAs.

Normally in a DTAA, the clause of IPS  applies in respect of a service provider who is an  individual (or in some cases firm of individuals-other than a company) and for the services which are in the nature of  “professional services or other independent activities of a similar character”.  “Professional services”  here includes independent scientific, literary, artistic, educational or teaching activities as well as the independent activities of physicians, surgeons, lawyers, engineers, architects, dentists and accountants.

Regarding taxability of fees for IPS in the hands of NR  in India,  it is provided in almost all DTAAs that such income shall be taxable only in the country of residence of receiver and shall be taxable in India only in following 2 situations :

  • the service provider has a fixed base regularly available to him in India for the purposes of performing his activities or
  • the person stays  in India for more than a minimum period ( normally 90 days) in a fiscal year.

If the case is not covered in any of the above 2 situations, the income is not taxable in India and accordingly no TDS is required u/s. 195.

For example one  may consider the case of  a US  university professor, Mr. Levin  who is a resident of USA and  has been engaged  by an Indian educational institute  for conducting  some classes in India for 10 days. The question is whether honorarium  paid to him is liable for TDS u/s. 195. One may note that the services provided by Mr. Levin are covered by “Independent Personal services” clause of DTAA.  He does not have any fixed base available to him in India for providing his services and he is also not in India for more than 90 days.  Accordingly as per Indo US DTAA, his remuneration / honorarium is taxable only in US and not in India. As such no TDS in India is applicable in this case.

Similar would be the case for a lawyer or an architect engaged in his individual capacity for providing services in India.

In a recent case of DCIT (International Taxation) Vs. Hydrosult Inc., tax payer had been awarded  contract  by Chhattisgarh   Government  for  providing   consultancy   services  under the  Chhattisgarh   Irrigation   Development  Project. It has paid consultancy fees to several independent professionals of foreign origin,  hired for technical services related with the project. The assessing officer objected to these payments on the ground of non deduction of TDS.  Ahmadabad Tribunal finally ruled in the favor of taxpayer mentioning that these payments were in the nature of fees for Independent Personal services and hence taxable only in the country of residence of the receiver. For coming to the conclusion, the tribunal examined the agreement between the consultants and the tax payer in great details and held the services performed in terms of the agreement to be of independent nature.

It is important to note that in almost all the DTAAs, the above concept of Independent Personal services is applicable only when the service provider is an individual (some DTAAs  apply this concept to partnerships also). However, if the Non resident entity is a company, then it is not a case of Independent Personal services but  a Fees for Technical Services or Business Income, depending upon the facts of the case. In such case there are different parameters to decide taxability or otherwise of Income in India.

Further, for claiming the benefits of DTAA,  requirements of Sec.  90(4) – a tax residency certificate from the country of residence of the receiver and of Sec. 90(5) read with rule  21AB- furnishing declaration by NR in form 10F, are also required to be complied with.

Thus, if the payment is being made to a non resident individual  and services of NR are in the nature of Independent Personal Services,  then (subject to compliance with the requirements of DTAA and of Sec. 90 of the Act) such income is not taxable in India and as such no TDS u/s. 195 is warranted from such payment.

A Note of Caution

Rules of DTAAs differ from country to country and DTAA with a specific country may have a separate rule regarding taxability of income discussed above. Any decision regarding taxability or otherwise of income in the hands of NR must be taken after careful study of DTAA with the country of residence of  NR payee. This article does not constitute a legal opinion and is written only for generating a basic awareness about the concept of Independent Personal Services.

(The author can be reached at [email protected] or on +91 98260 46463 for any queries)

Author Bio

More Under Income Tax

3 Comments

  1. CA Goutam Chand Baid says:

    In case payment made by a resident to non resident (LLP) for professional services (Advocacy), which is not treated as ”fees for technical services” (not covered by specific definition) and also not covered as independent personal services (Being not an Individual assessee), shall be considered under Business Profit Article (Taxable as per residential status) or under residual article (other income) (Taxable as per law of contracting state) (TDS Applicable).

  2. M L Raju says:

    Sir,
    Thank you very much for the detailed explanation. We are engaging the services of US citizen for marketing in USA and paying on per day basis. As he is a US citizen and providing personal services, we need not deduct tax. We have executed an agreement with the required clauses. Your post has cleared our doubt on TDS.
    Regards
    M L Raju

Cancel reply

Leave a Comment to CA srishti

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Posts by Date

September 2021
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930