Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ganga Iron & Steel Trading Co. Vs CIT (Bombay High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ganga Iron & Steel Trading Co. Vs CIT (Bombay High Court) Specification of Charge of penalty under section 271(1)(c) is an important factor while deciding the matters in litigation- Ganga Iron and Steel Trading Co. v Commissioner of Income Tax dated 22.12.2021 , 447 ITR 743 (Bom.) It is the experience of the author that penalty proceedings are initiated as a ritual and in a routine manner. Whenever any type of addition is made upto the AY 2016­17 penalty proceedings were mainly governed by section 271(1)(c). After that section 270A replacing section 271(1)(c). Under section 271(1)(c), pen...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

Advocate Amit Kumar Gupta, proprietor of Amit R Gupta & Associates, a Chartered Accountant and renowned lawyer. He is practicing in the field of Income Tax for over two decades and has diverse industries experience in all areas of Income tax Litigation, Taxation and Audits and now he has started View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Another Reassessment Notice Cannot be Issued by AO for Same AY Absolute power corrupts absolutely Whether Judges & Advocates can only be appointed as Judicial Member of Tribunal? Reasons to Believe is foundation stone of reassessment proceedings u/s 147/148 Provisions for Jewellery found under Search View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930