Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dr. Rahul Doctor Vs The ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. No. 827/Mum/2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 12/06/2013
Related Assessment Year : 2008- 09
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

The assessee has shown Long Term Capital gains during the year at Rs. 3888,313/- which has been accepted by the AO. If the AO was of the firm belief that the assessee is engaged in trading activities in the shares then it should not make any difference if the shares are held more than 12 months and less than 12 month

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

0 Comments

  1. dattatreyahg says:

    If straightforward share transactions like this also have to go thro’ Tribunal/court interventions,and such matters are still in the realm of vague discretionary interpretations of AOs, what kind of sanctity can we attach to these antiquted IT ACT/RULES?!.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
September 2024
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30