Case Law Details
Case Name : Arvind Kumar Jolly Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Chandigarh
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Arvind Kumar Jolly Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
ITAT Chandigarh: ₹25 Lakh Leave Encashment Limit Held Prospective – PSU Retiree Restricted to ₹3 Lakh Exemption
Assessee, a retired employee of Union Bank of India (PSU), received ₹9,56,280 as leave encashment upon superannuation. He claimed the entire amount as exempt u/s 10(10AA), but CPC, Bengaluru, restricted the exemption to ₹3,00,000 under Section 10(10AA)(ii) applicable to non-government employees. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal ex parte, holding that the enhanced limit of ₹25 lakh notified on 24.05.2023 was not
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
Author Bio
Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.
2 Comments
Cancel reply
Judgement required in Chander Prakash Vashist vs ITO, ITAT Jaipur bench decision Dt 13/10/2025
In Chandra Prakash Vashistha Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur) ITA. No. 1139/JPR/2025
Dated : 07/10/2025 the decision was the opposite