Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Panexcell Clinical Lab Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 6629/Mum./2017
Date of Judgement/Order : 24/01/2023
Related Assessment Year : 2014–15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Panexcell Clinical Lab Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)

ITAT find that the assessee is in the business of drug analysis, clinical trials, and other research activities and as part of the said business, the assessee does lab study of various drugs before their launch in the market. As per the assessee, for the purpose of such lab study, the assessee conducts the trial on various persons, who acts as a volunteer and as a consideration, the assessee pays such volunteers in cash. During the hearing, reliance was placed upon cash vouchers of drug analysis expenses, forming part of the paper book from pages No. 214 – 245. From the perusal of said vouchers, we find that the said vouchers mention the volunteer centre ID, the amount paid, and the signature of the volunteer on the date of payment. The learned AR submitted that the names of the volunteers are not mentioned to maintain anonymity regarding the identity of the volunteer and instead the ID No. is mentioned in the record. It was also submitted that this manner also safeguards the interest of the pharmaceutical company, whose drugs are tested. On a careful perusal of these vouchers, it is evident that the same cannot be called self-made, since these vouchers also contain the signatures of different volunteers acknowledging the receipt of payment in cash on different dates. In absence of any other allegation, we find no basis for confirming the disallowance upheld by the learned CIT(A). Accordingly, we direct the AO to delete the disallowance in respect of drug analysis expenses

FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT MUMBAI

The present appeal has been filed by the assessee challenging the impugned order dated 01/09/2017, passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”) by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)–24, Mumbai, [“learned CIT(A)”], for the assessment year 2014–15.

2. In its appeal, the assessee has raised the following grounds:–

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031