Case Law Details
Shyamlal Rupchand Parwani Vs ACIT (Gujarat High Court)
In a significant judgment, the Gujarat High Court in the case of Shyamlal Rupchand Parwani vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (ACIT), has clarified its position on the jurisdictional aspects and procedural propriety regarding notices issued under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This decision has far-reaching implications for taxpayers and the administration of tax law in India. This article delves deep into the nuances of the court’s ruling, elucidating its implications for the principle of natural justice and the procedural safeguards envisaged by the Income Tax Act.
Background of the Case
The petitioner, Shyamlal Rupchand Parwani, challenged the notice dated 09.06.2022 for the Assessment Year 2014-15 issued under Section 153C, alongside the objection disposal order dated 02.12.2023 and a subsequent notice under Section 142(1) dated 11.12.2023. The grounds for challenge were primarily the non-provision of the satisfaction note and the absence of incriminating material warranting such a notice.
Key Arguments and Court’s Observations
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Author Bio
