Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Direct Media Distribution Ventures Pvt. Ltd. Vs Pr. CIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 2211/Mum/2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 04/10/2019
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Direct Media Distribution Ventures Pvt. Ltd. Vs Pr. CIT (ITAT Mumbai)

We find that the ld CIT at the beginning of his show cause notice stated that no enquiry was made by the ld AO in the instant case on the subject mentioned transactions of gift of shares of Dish TV India Ltd by assessee to its related concern. But in the final para of his order stated that the ld AO had concluded without making proper enquiries. This shows the complete departure by the ld CIT from his show cause notice. We find that by his version in final para of his order, the ld CIT had conceded the fact that the ld AO had indeed made enquiries on the impugned issue of transfer of shares by way of gift to another related concern. Hence once an issue which had been enquired by the ld AO and assessee having given detailed reply explaining the purpose, factual and legal position thereon and ld AO having taken a possible view thereon, it cannot be said that the order passed by the ld AO is erroneous and hence no revision proceedings u/s 263 of the Act would lie on the same. The Hon’ble Supreme Court had categorically held that the twin conditions are to be satisfied cumulatively by the ld CIT before invoking his jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Act viz (i) order of the AO should be erroneous and (ii) it should be prejuducial to the interests of the revenue. In the instant case, the aforesaid detailed observations go clearly to prove that the order of the ld AO cannot be construed as erroneous. Hence the revision order passed by the ld CIT u/s 263 of the Act deserve to be quashed and is hereby quashed.

FULL TEXT OF THE ITAT JUDGEMENT

This appeal in ITA No.2211/Mum/2019 for A.Y.2014-15 preferred by the order against the revision order of the Id. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-6, Mumbai u/s.263 of the Act dated 14/03/2019 for the A.Y.2014-15.

2. Though the assessee had raised several grounds of appeal, the effective issue involved in this appeal is as to whether the Id CIT was justified in invoking revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Act in the facts and circumstances of the case.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031