No addition u/s 2(14)(iii) as land sold was agricultural land & didn't qualify as 'Capital Asset'
Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

No addition u/s 2(14)(iii) as land sold was agricultural land & didn’t qualify as ‘Capital Asset’

Case Law Details

Case Name
Hiten Tulshibhai Engineer Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2016-17
Advertisement
Hiten Tulshibhai Engineer Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) Conclusion: Land sold by assessee was agricultural Land and did not qualify as “capital asset” in terms of Section 2(14)(iii) as it was subsequent to purchase of land, its use was changed to non-agriculture purpose, therefore, the capital gain earned on the piece of land as not being liable to tax. Held: Assessee sold land during the year to a company for a certain consideration but had offered no income/ capital gains from the said transaction for taxation. Accordingly, reassessment proceedings under Section 147  were initiated, during th...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *