Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax- 2, Vs M/s Quark Media House India Pvt. Ltd. (Punjab & Haryana High Court)
Appeal Number : Income Tax Appeal No. 110 of 2016
Date of Judgement/Order : 24.01.2017
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
The presumption against the value being understated (not undervalued) is greater where parties are connected or related. However, if the AO does not allege that the assessee received more consideration than is stated in the sale deed, he cannot made an addition to the stated consideration. 

Full Text of the ITAT Order is as follows:-

This is an appeal against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dismissing the appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) allowing the assessee’s appeal against the order of the Assessing Officer. The matter pertains to the assessment year 2006-07.

2. According to the appellant, the following substantial questions of law arise:-

i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Hon’ble ITAT is right in deleting the addition by  holding that the transaction with a related party was not in terms of provisions of Section 40A(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act whereas the provisions of this Section were clearly applicable to the facts of the case?

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031