Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : CIT Vs Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Limited (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : 324 ITR 199 (Bom), ITA No. 2256 of 2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 12/03/2010
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

The question whether contract manufacturing agreements are subject to s. 194C has been decided by the Bombay High Court in Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. ITA No. 2256 of 2009 and other matters in favour of the assessees.

In an oral judgement pronounced today 12th March 2010, the Court held that while “works contracts” were subject to TDS under section 194C, “sales contracts” were not.

It upheld the arguments of the pharmaceutical companies that the contract manufacturing agreements entered into by them with other manufacturers amounted to a “sales contract” which was not liable to TDS u/s 194C.

Full Text of the case is as follows :-

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

0 Comments

  1. b.n. venkataramu says:

    what is the state of works contract executed wherein transfer of the peropery to party agnst order for doing interior of the buying party on turnkey basis
    would libale for 194C or not
    refering this judgment
    buyer has to dedcut tax or not under 194c if it si applicbale in bombay/maharastra or whole of india

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031