In this Volume of GST & Corporate Tax Tabloid dated 17.07.2021, I bring to you highlights of recent updates and important judgments of last week in the field of indirect taxation and direct taxation to keep you abreast of all the latest happenings.
1. GST Updates
2. Customs & DGFT
3. Income Tax
4. Important Judgements of the week
i. GST applicable only on amount exceeding ₹7,500 collected by Residential Welfare Associations:
The Hon’ble Madras High Court in Greenwood Owners Association v. Union of India [  128 taxmann.com 182 (Madras)] has ruled that only an amount in excess of ₹7,500/- per month per member collected by Residential Welfare Associations is taxable under the GST law. It also quashed a Circular issued by the CBIC that GST would be applicable on the entire maintenance amount if it exceeds ₹7,500 per month per person.
ii. Calcutta High Court stays TDS Collection under Section 194N Income Tax Act till September 30, 2021:
The Calcutta High Court passed an interim order in the case of Apeejay Tea Ltd. Anr. v. Union of India & Ors [WPA 10856 of 2021] restraining the Income Tax Department from collecting Tax Deduction at Source (TDS) under section 194N of the Income Tax Act, 1961 which mandates TDS on cash withdrawal from banks/post offices in excess of ₹ 1 crore
iii. Penalty imposed on Revenue for lethargy delay in filing SLP:
The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Union of India & Ors. v. M/s Vishnu Aroma Pouching Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. [Special Leave Petition(Civil) Diary No(s). 1434/2021 dated June 29, 2021] has imposed penalty of 25000/- INR on the Revenue Department for delay in filing the Special Leave Petition ( “SLP” ) for wastage of judicial time. Further, directed to recover the amount from officers responsible for the delay in filing the SLP.
iv. No Royalty on sale of software and no Fees for Technical Services on back-office services:
Bangalore ITAT in the case of QlikTech International AB [TS-537-ITAT-2021(Bang)] rules out royalty on distribution of software and holds that software payments are not taxable in India by placing reliance on landmark rulings in case of Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence. It further held that back office services don’t qualify as Fees for Technical Services under India-Sweden tax treaty by invoking the benefit of the ‘make available clause’ contained India Portugal DTAA and India-US DTAA.
v. Police investigation into alleged GST offence cannot be ordered after taking cognizance under the Cr.P.C.
The Hon’ble Tripura High Court in Shri Sentu Dey v. State of Tripura [Criminal Petition No. 14/2021 dated May 28, 2021] quashed the order passed for police investigation by the Judicial Magistrate in a matter of alleged GST offence. Held that, once the cognizance of offences alleged in the complaint has been taken by the Magistrate, it was thereafter not open to change the course and revert back to the initial option of requiring police investigation and calling for police report.
Disclaimer: The article is for informative purposes only.
The author can be reached at [email protected]