Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : In re Valley Residents Welfare Society (GST AAR Haryana)
Appeal Number : Advance Rulings No. HR/ARL/18/2022-23
Date of Judgement/Order : 22/09/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

In re Valley Residents Welfare Society (GST AAR Haryana)

AAR held that welfare activities done by the society for its resident members fall within the ambit of Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 and  these activities attract GST. GST leviable on collecting Common Area Maintenance (CAM) charges in lieu of services provided to its resident members by Society.

FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF CUSTOMS AUTHORITY OF ADVANCE RULING, HARYANA

APPLICANT’S ELIGIBILITY FOR SEEKING AN ADVANCE RULING:

To file an application before the Authority of Advance Ruling, the applicant must satisfy the conditions prescribed under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as CGST Act, 2017) and Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as HGST Act, 2017). Since the provisions of both the Acts are parimateria, any reference to provisions of CGST Act, 2017 in this order should be construed as a reference to corresponding provisions in HGST Act, 2017 as well. Sections 97(2) of the CGST Act, 2017 prescribes that Advance Ruling may be sought inter alia on the question of (b) Applicability of a notification issue under the provisions of this Act. (e) Determination of the liability to pay tax on any goods or services or both. (g) Whether any particular thing done by the applicant with respect to any goods and/or services or both amounts to or results in a supply of goods and/or services or both, within the meaning of that term. Proviso with reference to the Section 98(2) of CGST Act 2017 states that where the question raised in the…………………………………….  pending nor decided in any proceedings under any of the provisions of the Act. Besides the applicable fees in the case has been paid. So, he is eligible to seek an Advance Ruling under the above provisions and the case is being heard on merits.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031