This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
AAR not allowed to answer on place of supply
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- In re Shalini Manish Mittal (GST AAR Maharashtra)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- AAR Maharashtra, Advance Rulings
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
In re Shalini Manish Mittal (GST AAR Maharashtra)
Issue- Whether online or telephonic educational coaching from India for corporate, individuals or any other entities residing required outside India is subject to GST and if so under which category is it taxed and section/notification covered for the same
Held-
On perusal of the provision of section 97(2), we find’ that the question on the determination of place of supply has not been covered in the above set of questions, on which advance ruling can be given. Therefore, we do not have jurisdiction to pass any ruling on such questions whi...



