Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 35 Results

No Penalty can be levied for delayed filing of E-Returns If Manual Returns filed within Time

Case Name : M/s. Ravel Electronics Pvt. Ltd. Vs CCE (CESTAT Chennai)
Appeal Number : E/42086/2017
Date of Judgement/Order : 21/05/2018
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (690) CESTAT Chennai (86)

Penalty under excise Rules cannot be imposed merely for mere non-filing of separate appeal by Managing Partner

Case Name : M/s. Rajhans Enterprises Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Bangalore)
Appeal Number : E/20293/2018-SM
Date of Judgement/Order : 25/04/2018
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (690) CESTAT Bangalore (91)

CESTAT is not proper Appellate Forum for Dispute of Rebate Claim

Case Name : Shree Rajasthan Syntex Ltd. Vs Union of India (Rajasthan High Court)
Appeal Number : D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1214/2018
Date of Judgement/Order : 04/04/2018
Related Assessment Year :

Penalty under excise rule 26 can be imposed only on natural individual person

Case Name : Apple Sponge and Power Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Service Tax, Audit-I (CESTAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Appeal No. E/86386/2017
Date of Judgement/Order : 20/04/2018
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (690) CESTAT Mumbai (139)

Activity of fixing MRP stickers amounts to manufacture & liable to excise duty

Case Name : Amit Talwar Vs CCE, Delhi-I (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Final Order Nos. 51711–51714/2018
Date of Judgement/Order : 08/05/2018
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (690) CESTAT Delhi (243)

Input service credit not allowable on Insurance of family members of the employees

Case Name : Mercedes Benz India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Appeal No.E/86634/17
Date of Judgement/Order : 04/04/2018
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (690) CESTAT Mumbai (139)

Demand under Rule 14 cannot be made on ISD if he does not avail cenvat credit

Case Name : Kansai Nerolac Paints Ltd. Vs Commissioner of GST, Mumbai Central (CESTAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Appeal Nos. ST/87792,87798/2017
Date of Judgement/Order : 20/04/2018
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (690) CESTAT Mumbai (139)

Exemption Can’t be denied for Mere Technical Mistake: Rajasthan High court

Case Name : Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax Central Excise Vs Bhoorathanam Construction Co. (P) Ltd. (Rajasthan High Court)
Appeal Number : D.B. Central/excise Appeal No. 22/2018
Date of Judgement/Order : 13/03/2018
Related Assessment Year :

Doctrine of Revenue Neutrality Applicable when Assessee gets no benefit by not reversing cenvat credit on inputs

Case Name : M/s. Sanvijay Rolling & Engineering Ltd. Vs The Commissioner of Central Excise (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : Central Exicse Appeal No. 83 of 2016
Date of Judgement/Order : 24/01/2018
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (4124) Bombay High Court (740)

Unutilized Credit of EC and SHE could not be cross-utilized against excise duty or service tax

Case Name : Cellular Operators Association of India Vs Union of India (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : Writ Petition (Civil) No. 7837/2016
Date of Judgement/Order : 15/02/2018
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (4124) Delhi High Court (1281)
Page 1 of 41234