Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : CCE Vs Hindustan Unilever (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal No: 1941 of 2006
Date of Judgement/Order : 25/08/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Brief of the case

Supreme Court held In the case of CCE v. Hindustan Unilever that Vaseline intensive Care Heel Guard is a medicament as it is produced under the Drug Licence and also before classifying any particular product the dominant function have to be considered.

Facts of the Case

In the present case the issue before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India is regarding classification of Vaseline Intensive Care Heel Guard that whether it is a skin care preparation or it is a medicament having curing properties. The Revenue wants to cover it under Chapter 33 of Central excise Tariff Act, 1985. If any particular product is to be classified under the said chapter then the said product should be related to skin care. On the other hand, the assessee wants it to be classified under the Chapter 30 of the Act i.e. pharmaceutical products. After referring to Chapter 30 the assessee contended that the VHG patent or proprietary medicament is classifiable under Chapter 30 Heading 3003.10 and only 15% duty is paid.

Held by the Hon’ble Supreme Court

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031