Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Supreme Court of India

SC: Person in whose name vehicle stands registered on date of accident is ‘Owner’ entitled to Insurance Claim

June 18, 2020 17004 Views 0 comment Print

Surendra Kumar Bhilawe vs. New India Assurance Company Limited (Supreme Court) The Supreme Court in the case of Surendra Kumar Bhilawe vs. The New India Assurance Company Limited  in Civil Appeal no 2632 of 2020 decided recently on 18 June 2020 has held that the person in whose name the motor vehicle stands registered would […]

Contributory Negligence – Passengers Travelling in A Horse Cart

June 18, 2020 609 Views 0 comment Print

Passengers travelling in vehicle cannot be held responsible for contributory negligence of the driver of the vehicle and claim cannot be reduced on the same ground. Rajendra Singh and Ors (Appelant) Vs. National Insurance Company Limited and Ors (Supreme Court)

No Section 80O deduction for income received from foreign enterprise for rendering services in India

June 16, 2020 2889 Views 0 comment Print

Service charges received by assessees from the foreign enterprises did not qualify for deduction in view of clause (iii) of the Explanation to Section 80O as the services rendered by respective assessees were the ‘services rendered in India’ and not the ‘services rendered from India’ and merely having a contract with a foreign enterprise and mere earning foreign exchange did not ipso facto lead to the application of s. 80O of the Act.

Case Analysis: Union of India v. Azadi Bachao Andolan (2004)

June 12, 2020 48312 Views 0 comment Print

The law with regards to the DTAA and the powers of Income Tax and other administrative authorities in its implementation have evolved with the development of various judicial trends ranging from the case of McDowell, Azadi Bachao Andolan to Vodafone-Hatchison Case, to name a few.

Lockdown period wages: Employers & Employees Should Negotiate & Settle themselves: SC

June 12, 2020 7566 Views 0 comment Print

Ficus Pax Private Limited  Vs Union Of India & Ors. (Supreme Court) Hon’ble Supreme Court in an interim order passed today in the case of FICUS PAX PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. P VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. has stated that Employers and Employees Should Try to negotiate and settle between themselves issues relating to […]

Lockdown Period Wages: SC asks states to facilitate negotiation between employer & employees

June 12, 2020 876 Views 0 comment Print

Payment to labour during lockdown: SC on June 12 asks states to facilitate negotiations between employers & employees – no coercive action till end of July A number of writs were filed in the apex court questioning the orders issued under Disaster Management Act, 2005 and  consequential orders issued by different States  that all industries […]

Non-rejection of explanation in Assessment Order amounts to acceptance: SC

June 8, 2020 2841 Views 1 comment Print

The non-rejection of the explanation in the Assessment Order would amount to the Assessing Officer accepting the view of the assessee, thus taking a view/forming an opinion.

Exclusion of Lockdown Period- SC cannot issue any direction to RBI

June 8, 2020 1362 Views 0 comment Print

Harsh Nitin Gokhale Vs Reserve Bank of India & Ors (Supreme Court) In the present case, writ petition file seeking relief to exclude the time period of lockdown for calculating the limitation for presentation of cheque/demand draft within 3 months as per policy decision of RBI. Supreme Court states that they cannot issue any direction […]

SC explains distinction between ‘retirement of a partner’ & ‘dissolution of a partnership firm

June 5, 2020 13977 Views 0 comment Print

Supreme court held that there is a clear distinction between ‘retirement of a partner’ and ‘dissolution of a partnership firm’. On retirement of the partner, the reconstituted firm continues and the retiring partner is to be paid his dues in terms of Section 37 of the Partnership Act.

Reimbursement of sales tax levied on taxable turnover of works contracts was allowable to contractor company

June 5, 2020 1788 Views 0 comment Print

he claim of the contractor company for reimbursement of the amount of sales tax levied on the taxable turnover of the works contracts executed by it, i.e., with reference to the expression ‘completed item of work’ in the said Clause 45.2 and with reference to the stipulations contained in Clauses 13.3 of ITB and 45.1 of GCC, were wholly untenable and appellant and its contracting offices were under obligation to honour the claim so made by the contractor company.

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031