Deepak Sales & Properties Pvt. Ltd Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) There is no dispute between the parties that bonafide nature of transactions alone would not be sufficient to escape the clutches of sec. 271D of the Act. As per the decision rendered by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Kum. A.B. Shanthi (supra), it […]
Shri Sachin R. Tendulkar Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai): The assessee had been unable to let out the property for the captioned period, he was entitled to deduction under section 23(1)(c) for vacancy allowance
Shilpa Shetty case: Recording of ‘satisfaction’ about the existence of an international transaction was only within the jurisdiction of the AO and CIT(A) could not substitute his satisfaction for that of the AO.
Mumbai ITAT Ruling – Section 92 of the Act is not an independent charging section to bring in a new head of income or to charge tax on income which is otherwise not chargeable under the Act. Accordingly, the ITAT held that, if no income accrues or arises or is received by the assessee under […]
DCIT Vs. Rahul Rajnikant Parikh (ITAT Mumbai) We note that at the time of opening of the bank account in Geneva, the assessee was a US citizen and resident and he was holding a US passport. Still the assessee chose to open the account in HSBC bank account in Geneva by using the address and proof thereof […]
DCIT Vs Dipendu Bapalal Shah (ITAT Mumbai) In the instant case undisputedly the assessee is a non-resident since 1979, as per the provisions of Section 6 of the IT Act. The scope of income in case of a non-resident is defined under the provisions of sub-section (2) of section 5 of the Act. As per […]
ITO Vs. Arihant Estates Pvt. Ltd (ITAT Mumbai) In the case on hand before us it is an undisputed fact that both assessees have treated the unsold flats as stock in trade in the books of account and the flats sold by them were assessed under the head ‘income from business’. Thus, respectfully following the above […]
Installation of set-top box amounted to works contract and no technical expertise was required so as to make the assessee liable to deduct tax under section 194J.
Mateen Pyarali Dholkia Vs. DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) In the instant case, the profit arising from the sale of shares was received by the assessee directly which constituted its income at the point when it reached or accrued to the assessee. The fee for PMS on the other hand was paid separately by the assessee to […]
Section 14A of the Act provides that for the purposes of computing the total income under Chapter, no deduction shall be allowed in respect of expenditure incurred by the assessee in relation to income which does not form part of the total income under the Act. Hence, what section 14A provides is that if there […]
