Assessee was not liable to deduct TDS on license fees paid to Israel entity as it had already furnished certificate from a chartered accountant, return of income and computation of income under section 139 and income of assessee was not taxable in India and assessee had already filed the relevant information u/s 201(1) which showed that assessee could not be regarded as ‘assessee in default’.
Navajbai Ratan Tata Trust Vs PCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Mumbai ITAT UNIQUE ORDER on one tata trust case where assessee opted out of benefit of sec 12AA to apparently save itself from onerous tax exposure with sec 12AA on its head so in these circumstances it is held that 42. The question then arises as to […]
R. D Tata Trust Vs PCIT (ITAT Mumbai) We are of the considered view that the impugned order of cancellation of registration granted to the assessee under section 12A must be held to be effective from the date on which the hearing on first show-cause notice was concluded and the show cause notice issued by […]
Sulzer Pumps India Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) As mentioned earlier, for the year under consideration, the assessee has paid a sum of Rs.51,28,703/- as Cess in the return filed by it. It did not claim the amount paid, as deduction in the return filed by it for AY 2012-13. However, in the light of […]
UHDE India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Addl. Commissioner of Income Tax (ITAT Mumbai) We find that the assessee has accumulated cost as well as revenue under these projects in the Balance Sheet by following completed contract method. The revenue has accepted such accumulation during AYs 2004-05 & 2005-06 and this is the third year of accumulation […]
Loss incurred on account of error trades in respect of dealings of clients and not on own account and the loss incurred in course of carrying on share broking business was in line with accepted market practices, therefore, disallowance of Rs. 35,82,623/- on account of loss on share trading and ad-hoc disallowance of Rs.5,00,000/-, not supported by any reasonable basis had been rightly deleted by CIT(A).
Chandrakant R. Agrawal Vs PCIT (ITAT Mumbai) At the first blush the claim of the assessee for setting off the interest paid on the loan raised (on security of the FDR’s) against the interest received on FDR’s appeared to be very convincing. However, we find that the issue is no more res integra and had […]
ACIT Vs Herbert Brown Pharmaceuticals & Research Laboratories (ITAT Mumbai) The learned Departmental Representative relied upon the order of the Assessing Officer and submitted that though the recipient of loan or advance by the company is not a shareholder but is a concern in which shareholders are having substantial interest. He submitted that the learned […]
Uber India Systems Private Limited Vs Jt. CIT (ITAT Mumbai) Uber B.V. is involved in rendering lead generation service to the Driver-Partner and transportation service is not provided by Uber B.V. or UISPL. The transportation service is provided by the Driver- Partner to the User for which the car is arranged by the Driver-Partner, all […]
Bank of India Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) To sum up, the assessee is declined the foreign tax credits for Rs 182,64,22,948, and, accordingly, we hold that the assessee is not entitled to seek a refund of that money from the Indian tax exchequer. As we hold so, we may add that in the present case, […]
