Grasim Industries Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) By way of this stay application, the assessee applicant has sought a stay on collection/ recovery of tax and interest demands aggregating to Rs 3,786.34 crores in respect of the dividend distribution tax (DDT), and interest thereon, under section 115O/115Q r.w.s. 2(22)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, on, what […]
Greatship (India) Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) The assessee has further assailed the disallowance worked out by the A.O under Sec. 1 4A r.w Rule 8D, on the ground that there was no recording of an objective satisfaction by the A.O that the suo-motto disallowance offered by the assessee under Sec. 14A was not correct. […]
The provisions of the DTAA cannot be thrusted upon the Assessee simply because the Assessee is a tax resident of a country with which India has entered into a tax treaty or on account of the mere perception of the AO that the Assessee may claim benefits under the tax treaty in subsequent years. 2. Short term losses should be eligible to be carried forward.
The Transfer Pricing Officer has simply estimated the arm’s length price of the transaction on estimate basis without applying any one of the approved methods. This cannot be accepted.
ITO Vs KEM Hospital & Sheth GSM College Employees Co-operative Credit Society Limited (ITAT Mumbai) Assessee which is a co-operative credit society is not a primary co-operative bank, hence, it would not be hit by the provisions of Sec. 80P(4) as had been made available on the statute vide the Finance Act, 2006 w.e.f 01.04.2007. […]
Red Hat India Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) From the bare reading of the proviso to section 147 of the Act, it is mandatory on the part of the ld AO to duly mention in the reasons recorded itself as to whether there is any failure on the part of the assessee in disclosing […]
Since teaching of Indian Classical Music was within the field of ‘education’ and the activities of the studio were carried on in order to achieve the main object of the Trust, the same could not be construed as a business and the proviso to section 2(15) did not apply on the same.
DCIT Vs M/s. Rabo India Finance Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai) In the present case, the reason for invoking provisions of section 69 of the Act germinates from the contents of letters dated 27/07/2011 and 06/09/2011 written by one of the employee indicating that the assessee has extended loan of GBP 37.50 million as per part of […]
Sahakar Global Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Issue- Addition of Rs. 3,50,00,000/- as unexplained cash credit u/s. 68 in respect of amount received during the year as share capital and premium from M/s. Vanguard Jewels Ltd, Ansh Merchandise Pvt Ltd., Alka Diamond Industries Ltd & Talent Infoway Pvt Ltd. Held: Additions have primarily been made […]
Af-taab Investment Company Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) In this case the assessee had a bonafide belief that the loss suffered by it is business loss. The change of nature of loss from business loss to speculative loss was not enough to impose penalty on the assessee. Therefore, we are inclined to delete the penalty […]
