it is found that Mr. Prakash had neither disclosed the appointment of his brother through M/s Ibay Capital before the CoC nor made relationship disclosure of engagement of M/s Ibay Capital on the website of the IPA. Further, the valuation report was submitted by M/s iVas Partners whose appointment or fee was not approved/ratified by [&hel...

Utility Premises Private Limited Vs Central Public Information Officer (First Appellate Authority of IBBI) The Respondent had stated that under RTI Act, only citizens can seek information and since the Applicant being a Company is not a citizen, it is not eligible to seek information under RTI Act. In J.C. Talukdar vs. C.E.(E) CPWD Kolkat...

An IRP / RP is appointed by the AA and is duty bound to conduct CIRP with fairness and diligence and must maintain absolute independence in discharge of his statutory duties without any external influences. The entire resolution process of a CD is dependent on the IRP/ RP who is primarily responsible for efficiently and […]...

Regulation 26(4) of the CIRP Regulations makes it mandatory for the RP to make disclosure about the voting pattern, the objective being to ensure transparency in the process and boost confidence among the CoC members. As per the regulation 26(4) of CIRP Regulations, Mr. Pramod Kumar Sharma was to disclose the names of the members [&hellip...

RTI Act does not cast on the public authority any obligation to answer queries in which the petitioner attempts to elicit answer to his queries with prefixes as why, what when and whether. The petitioner’s right extends only to seeking information as defined in section 2(f) either by pointing the file document, paper or record etc., or ...