CIT (E) Vs Dabur Research Foundation (Delhi High Court) The Supreme Court in Hero Vinoth (Minor) vs. Seshammal, (2006) 5 SCC 545 has also held that in a case where from a given set of circumstances two inferences of fact are possible, the one drawn by the lower appellate court will not be interfered by […]
If the Petitioner have claimed and received only the customs duty portion of the drawback and element of IGST (earlier Central Excise Duty and Service Tax) was not included in the drawback rate, granting of IGST refund would not result in double neutralization of input taxes. The Respondents have also never intended to deny a refund of IGST paid on export in cases where only custom components were claimed as drawbacks.
Held, the amendment of Section 140 of the CGST Act does not affect the right of Petitioner to claim transitional credit and it would be unnecessary to deal with the Constitutional challenge to it. Further, noted the Petitioner is at the liberty to apply for Transitional Credit subject to the further order from the Hon’ble Supreme Court in SLP (C) No.7425-7428/2020 (supra).
Religare Finvest Limited Vs DCIT (Delhi High Court) Learned counsel for the petitioner relies on the judgment dated 03rd August, 2021 passed by this Court in Eko India Financial Services Pvt Ltd vs. ACIT, WP(C) No.5819/2021 wherein under similar circumstances the Respondents were directed to refund the amounts collected in excess of 20% of the […]
Harbux Singh Sidhu Vs Department of Income Tax (Delhi High Court) Learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that the Respondent had vide 19th April, 2016 requested the Bank officials to verify the transaction of the Petitioner by which it had made a payment of Rs. 6,50,000/- towards payment of Advance Tax for FY 2000-01. He […]
The issue before Delhi High Court is whether the entire amount frozen in accounts with National West Minister Bank London is the case property or alleged proceeds of the crime and may be liable for confiscation in case the Petitioner’s are convicted and thus cannot be utilized for fulfilling the tax demands due against the Petitioners.
Floral Realcon Pvt. Ltd. Vs National Faceless Assessment Centre (Delhi High Court) This Court is of the view that Section 144B(1)(xvi)(b) mandatorily provides for issuance of a prior show cause notice (SCN) and draft assessment order before issuing a final assessment order. Since in the present case the averment that no show cause notice as […]
Hyosung Corporation Vs Union of India & Ors. (Delhi High Court) Learned counsel for the Department states that the petitioner has filed a rectification application in which a prayer for up-to-date interest has also been made. He assures and undertakes to this Court that the petitioner’s rectification application shall be decided within two weeks and […]
L S Cable and System Ltd. Vs Union of India & Ors. (Delhi High Court) 1. The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing. 2. Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to respondent no.2 to issue refund determined vide assessment order dated 29th November, 2019 under Section 143(3) of the […]
Hindon River Mills Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) The limited issue which arises in the present appeal is whether unabsorbed depreciation available in the hands of the assessee, where the business of the assessee has been temporarily closed and the assets leased for a short period in order to tide over the losses of business, […]
