Withholding certificate at a low tax rate rejected for huge outstanding demand, although same were due to pending rectification applications
If no incriminating material found during Income Tax search in respect of an issue, no addition for such issue can be made Sections 153A/153C
Addition by AO without providing any cogent reasoning or working, based on which such disallowances were made are not sustainable.
Disputed demand has arisen for failure of Tata Teleservices to deduct tax at source on interest payments made to China Development Bank
Held that insufficiency of evidence or material is not a ground for setting aside an arbitral award. Income tax return is material evidence to establish the claim.
SRF Ltd Vs Union of India (Delhi High Court) Section 35(2AB) of the Act provides for weighted deduction of one and one half times (150%) of the expenditure incurred by a company on scientific research on in-house R&D facilities approved by the prescribed authority i.e. DSIR. In support of his submission, he relies upon Rule […]
There is no dispute that petitioners deposited taxes, however, the mistake which petitioners have committed is that they deposited tax under minor head ‘200’ instead of ‘400’.
Held that dispute in respect of ESOP which forms part of the Employment Agreement, would be referable to arbitration as provided in Clause 21 of ESOP.
Held that TDI was not seeking a review, but rather, a discharge/ modification of the conditions prescribed in the said interim order. Accordingly, Arbitral Tribunal was entitled to exercise the said option, having regard to the principles enshrined under Order XXXIX Rule 4 of CPC.
HC held that an Order under Section 241A of the Act cannot be passed in a mechanical and routine manner. Refunds cannot be withheld just because the Notice under Section 143(2) of the Act has been issued and the Respondents want to verify the claim for deduction under Section 10AA of the Act.
