Understand the Bombay High Court’s ruling on PCIT vs Kimberly Clark Lever Private Limited case regarding the reference to TPO and the scrutiny assessment as per the Income Tax Act 1961.
In a crucial verdict, the Bombay High Court allows BOCW cess refund to GE T and D India, emphasizing that supply contracts are outside the BOCW Cess Act’s purview.
Read judgment of Bombay High Court in case of Mayel Steels Pvt Ltd vs Union of India. Court held that respondent acted arbitrarily in canceling GST registration and directed that proper notice should be served to dealers.
Bombay High Court held that in absence of any specific provisions in the statute, duty or penalty liability of the company cannot be recovered from its Director, who is not personally liable towards liability of the Company.
Judgment by Bombay High Court in C.P. Rabindranath Menon v. Deputy Commissioner of State Tax, which allows unregistered persons to claim GST refunds for the period before issuance of a refund policy.
Read the analysis of the Bombay High Court’s judgment in the case of Aurobindo Pharam Limited Vs NYK Theseus. The court distinguishes between commonality or common ownership and the need for deceit or fraud to lift the corporate veil and establish the concept of alter ego.
The Bombay High Court maintained the cancellation of a liquor license post the demise of the license holder, clarifying the rules concerning license transfer to legal heirs or partners.
In the case of Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. vs DCIT, the Bombay High Court examines the requirement of tangible material for reopening an assessment. This analysis explores the claim of deduction on payment made to settle a class action suit and the court’s decision
Read the full text of the judgment/order of the Bombay High Court in the case of Oerlikon Balzers Coating India Pvt. Ltd. vs Union of India. The court strikes down a condition in DTVSV, benefiting the assessee.
Explore landmark ruling in Citibank N.A Vs S.K. Ojha case by Bombay High Court, confirming that post-Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme determination, the Assessing Officer lacks jurisdiction to reopen tax assessments under Section 143 of Income Tax Act. Unearth key insights from this case setting a precedent for businesses under KVSS.
