In re Work Group Sushikshit Berojgar Nagrik Sewa Sahkari Sanstha Maryadit Amravati (GST AAR Maharashtra) Clause (q) of the 12th Schedule mentioned above, mandates Municipal Corporations to provide Public amenities including street lighting, parking lots, bus stops and public conveniences. Applicant is providing manpower to the Amravati Municipal Corporation for collecting vehicle parking Charges in […]
In re Hitech Print Systems Limited (GST AAR Andhra Pradesh) Question: Printing of Pre examination items like question papers, OMR sheets (Optical Mark Reading), Answer booklets for conducting of an examination by the educational boards be treated as exempted supply of service in terms of Serial Number 66 of notification of No. 12/2017-CGST [Rate] dated […]
In re Tata Motors Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra) Section 17(5) had clearly debarred Input Tax Credit on motor vehicles or conveyances used in transport of passengers till the date of the amendment i.e. 01.02.2019. However with effect from 01.02.2019, Input Tax Credit has been allowed on leasing, renting or hiring of motor vehicles, for transportation […]
In re Prettl Automotive India Private Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra) Q1. Whether the financial assistance to be received by the Applicant are covered as consideration for supply and the activity is covered under the meaning of supply of services in terms of Section 7 of the CGST Act, 2017/MGST Tax Act, 2017? Answer:- Answered in […]
In re Janki Sushikshit Berojgar Nagrik Seva Sahakari Sanstha Ma (GST AAR Maharashtra) Applicant is mainly supplying manpower and only in the case of Government Ashram school, applicant is providing goods in the form of vegetable and mutton as per the contract executed. The first question raised by the applicant is whether the supply of […]
Since the application in this case is not accompanied by requisite fee of Rs. 10,000/- (i.e Rs. 5,000/- each under CGST and SGST), therefore the same is rejected. This ruling however does not in any way affect the right of the applicant to file a fresh application for seeking ruling on the same points provided it satisfies the provisions of section 97(1) of the CGST/ HPGST Act, 2017.
In re Amogh Ramesh Bhatawadekar (GST AAR Maharashtra) Question. I) Whether ‘e-goods’ as commercially known in the market are ‘goods’ as defined in the GST Acts or are they services as per GST Act? Answer: – E-goods, in this case- ‘Online Gaming’ will be covered under services under the GST Act. Question. 2) If they […]
In re Saint-Gobain India Private Limited (GST AAAR Maharashtra) As regards the issue of denial of fair chance of hearing with sample, we hold that the Appellant may approach the Maharashtra Advance Ruling Authority with a fresh application along with the sample/reports of the products and in that case, the MAAR shall decide the issue […]
Khaitan Chemicals and Fertiliser (GST AAR Madhya Pradesh) Authority is of the view that based on the detailed reading and understanding of Section 97 of the CGST Act, an application for Advance Ruling can only be made to determine the ‘liability to pay tax’ on any goods or services or both. Therefore, no application can […]
Vrinda Engineers Private Limited (GST AAR West Bangal) Whether fabrication of steel structures is job work when the materials except paint are supplied by the recipient? The applicant supplies a mixed supply constituting of the job work of fabrication of steel structures and the works contract of applying paint to the erected steel structures. It […]
