In re Manyam Venkateswara Rao (GST AAR Andhra Pradesh) Question: Whether in the facts and circumstances the contributions to National Mineral Exploration Trust (NMET) and District Mineral Foundation (DMF) under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (MMDR) read with National Mineral Exploration Trust Rules, 2015 (‘NMETR’) and Mines and Minerals (Contribution to […]
In re Vempati Veerraju (GST AAR Andhra Pradesh) Question: Whether in the facts and circumstances the contributions to National Mineral Exploration Trust (NMET) and District Mineral Foundation (DMF) under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (MMDR) read with National Mineral Exploration Trust Rules, 2015 (‘NMETR’) and Mines and Minerals (Contribution to District […]
In re Andru Sujatha (GST AAR Andhra Pradesh) The contributions to National Mineral Exploration Trust (NMET) and District Mineral Foundation (DMF) qualify as consideration towards supply of mining service by Andhra Pradesh Government and they being includible under value of supply, are chargeable to GST under the Reverse Charge Mechanism in the hands of the […]
In re Andru Usha Rani (GST AAR Andhra Pradesh) Argument of the applicant that Royalty is only a measure of NMET and DMF contributions and cannot be equated with NMET and DMF and that NMET and DMF are not in respect of single supply of service i.e. licensing that warrants clubbing of all amounts i.e. […]
In re Andru Anantha Padma KotiSatyavathi (GST AAR Andhra Pradesh) The service provided is only the license to extract mineral ore and also the right to use such minerals extracted is a single service where the consideration is payable under three heads and in case any one of the payments is not made, the service […]
In re Andru Ramesh Babu (GST AAR Andhra Pradesh) The contributions to National Mineral Exploration Trust (NMET) and District Mineral Foundation (DMF) qualify as consideration towards supply of mining service by Andhra Pradesh Government and they being includible under value of supply, are chargeable to GST under the Reverse Charge Mechanism in the hands of […]
In re Alfa Granites (GST AAR Karnataka) Whether the applicant has to discharge GST on the total amount being collected by them from Virat Associate LLP, which incldes DMG Royalty, DMF and Owner’s Royalty, under forward charge mechanism or on Owner’s Royalty only? (The Applicant requested to permit them to withdraw the application filed for […]
In re Page Industries Limited (GST AAR Karnataka) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the promotional products/Materials and Marketing Items used by the Applicant in promoting their brand and marketing their products can be considered as “inputs” as defined under Section 2(59) of the CGST Act, 2017 and GST paid on the […]
Tyre is made out of 30% to 35% Carbon, 35% to 40 % rubber and 10% to 15% steel. Once the tyres are removed from the car it becomes a waste. This waste is recycled by the applicant and the rubber component of the tyres is converted into oil which can be used for heating purposes and can be called as pyrolysis oil.
In re M/s. Sundharams Private Limited (AAR Maharashtra) Laying of the paver blocks cannot amount to works contract service for construction of the immovable property under section 17(5)(c) of CGST Act since, the expression “construction” for the purpose of section 17(5)(c) and 17(5)(d) includes reconstruction, renovation, addition or alteration or repairs to the extent of […]
