ITAT Hyderabad held that amendment to provisions of section 50C(1) of the Income Tax Act is retrospective in nature and hence the value adopted or assessed or assessable by the Stamp Valuation Authority on the date of agreement has to be taken for the purpose of full value of the consideration.
DCIT Vs HES Infra Private Limited (ITAT Hyderabad) The Hyderabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the agreement was not entered between the assessee and the Government / Statutory Government and there was a violation laid down by the statute and therefore, the assessee is not entitled to claim deduction The assessee […]
ITAT Mumbai held that provisions of Section 43CA of the Income Tax Act are effective only from 1st April 2014. Accordingly, the same are not applicable when part payment was received in 2010.
ITAT Mumbai held that addition u/s. 68 of the Income Tax Act merely based on statement of the key person which was retracted subsequently unsustainable as genuineness, identity and creditworthiness proved.
ITAT Delhi held that the payment of assessee made in cash in violation of section 40A(3) of the Act is not eligible for benefit of exceptions envisages under Rules 6DD(f) in absence of any evidence supporting identity and genuineness of the supplier.
In a recent case, ITAT Delhi ruled that having a difference of opinion alone is insufficient to invoke Section 263 of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Delhi rules that penalties under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act cannot be imposed based on non-existing or deleted disallowances.
In a recent case, ITAT Delhi ruled that an appeal by a suspended director after appointment of an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) is not maintainable.
In a recent case, ITAT Kolkata ruled that TDS on rent reimbursement is not deductible if there is no lessor and lessee relationship, siding with McNally Bharat Infrastructure.
In this article, we discuss ITAT Mumbai’s decision in Hiranandani Healthcare Pvt Ltd vs CIT case regarding set-off of brought forward losses and impact of Section 79 on individual shareholding changes.
