What is Dominant Position? Relevant factors determining Dominant Position and Effect of Abuse of Dominant Position under Competition Act, 2002
Dominant Position:
A dominant position refers to a significant level of market power held by a company or group of companies. It means having the ability to independently control prices, exclude competitors, or influence market conditions.
While market dominance itself is not illegal, abusing a dominant position is prohibited in many jurisdictions. Competition laws aim to prevent firms from engaging in practices that restrict competition, harm consumers, or stifle innovation.
Examples of abusive behaviour include unfair pricing, predatory practices, exclusive dealing, and discrimination against competitors. The criteria for determining a dominant position may vary across jurisdictions, but factors such as market share, barriers to entry, and the ability to exercise market power are typically considered.
Relevant factors determining Dominant Position
There are several factors that are relevant in determining whether a company holds a dominant position in a market:
1. Market share: A company with a high market share is more likely to have a dominant position in the market. A market share of 50% or more is often considered indicative of a dominant position. However, it is important to note that a high market share alone is not sufficient to determine a dominant position.
2. Market power: Market power is a measure of a company’s ability to affect market prices and conditions. A company with significant market power is more likely to have a dominant position in the market.
3. Market structure: The structure of the market, including the number of competitors and barriers to entry, is relevant in determining the dominant position. A market with a few large players and high barriers to entry is more likely to have a dominant player.
4. Entry barriers: High barriers to entry, such as high start-up costs or complex regulations, can make it difficult for new entrants to compete in the market and can allow dominant players to maintain their position.
5. Market definition: The definition of the relevant market is critical in determining the extent of a company’s market power. The market is defined as the area of competition in which the products or services of a company compete with each other.
6. Buyer power: The power of buyers in the market is relevant in determining the dominant position. If buyers have a significant degree of bargaining power, they may be able to negotiate favourable terms with suppliers and prevent a company from exercising dominant power in the market.
7. Business practices: The business practices of a company can also be relevant in determining its dominant position. For example, a company that engages in anti-competitive practices, such as exclusionary practices or discriminatory treatment of competitors, may be considered to have a dominant position in the market.
8. Economic power: The financial resources and economic strength of a company are relevant in determining its dominant position. A company with significant financial resources may be able to engage in practices that restrict competition, such as acquiring its competitors or investing in technologies that make it difficult for new entrants to compete.
9. Market dependence: The dependence of other companies on a dominant player can also be relevant in determining the dominant position. If a company’s products or services are essential for the operation of other companies in the market, this can increase the company’s market power and make it more likely to have a dominant position.
10. Vertical integration: The degree of vertical integration of a company, i.e., the extent to which it controls different stages of the production and distribution of a product, can also be relevant in determining the dominant position. For example, a company that controls a key input in the production process may have a dominant position in the market for that input.
11. Market segmentation: The extent to which a market is segmented, i.e., the extent to which there are different sub-markets within the market, can also be relevant in determining the dominant position. A company that has a dominant position in one sub-market may be able to extend that dominance to other sub-markets.
12. Market trends: The trends in the market, including changes in consumer preferences and technological advancements, can also be relevant in determining the dominant position. A company that is able to adapt quickly to changing market conditions is more likely to maintain or increase its market power.
Effect of Abuse of Dominant Position
The abuse of dominant position can have significant negative effects on both competition and consumers. Some of the most common effects of abuse of dominant position include:
1. Reduced competition: Anti-competitive practices such as price fixing, exclusionary conduct, and tying arrangements can restrict competition and reduce the number of players in the market. This can result in less choice for consumers and higher prices.
2. Reduced innovation: When competition is restricted, companies may have less incentive to innovate and develop new products and services. This can result in a slowdown in technological progress and reduced economic growth.
3. Reduced consumer welfare: Consumers can be negatively affected by abuse of dominant position in a number of ways. For example, they may have to pay higher prices for goods and services or have less choice in the market.
4. Deterrent effect on entry: Anti-competitive practices can also have a deterrent effect on entry, making it more difficult for new entrants to enter the market and compete. This can reduce the level of competition and result in less innovation and higher prices for consumers.
5. Market foreclosure: The abuse of dominant position can also result in market foreclosure, i.e., the dominant player can prevent its competitors from accessing essential inputs or customers, making it more difficult for them to compete.
6. Damage to reputation: Companies that engage in anti-competitive practices can also damage their reputation and brand image. Consumers may be less likely to do business with a company that is perceived as engaging in anti-competitive practices.
7. Legal and financial penalties: Companies that engage in abuse of dominant position can face legal and financial penalties, including fines, injunctions, and other remedies. These penalties can be significant and can have a significant impact on the financial health and reputation of the company.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the abuse of dominant position can have significant negative effects on both competition and consumers. Competition law aims to prevent such abuse and promote fair and open competition, and companies with dominant positions must be mindful of their obligations under competition law to avoid engaging in anti-competitive practices.
Author Bio
