Case Law Details
Ketan Kantilal Modi Vs Union of India & Ors (Supreme Court of India)
This article dissects the Supreme Court case, Ketan Kantilal Modi Vs Union of India & Others, a case revolving around the proper reward for the revelation of tax evasion. We explore the intricacies of the verdict, which has seen the Supreme Court order a reconsideration of the reward granted to the whistleblower.
Ketan Kantilal Modi, the appellant, had provided information leading to the discovery of a significant tax evasion amounting to Rs. 2.59 crores. As per the policy, he was entitled to a reward of up to 20% of the amount evaded, translating to Rs.51.87 lakhs. However, the appellant was given a significantly lower reward of Rs. 5.50 lakhs. The Supreme Court heard the case and directed the Reward Committee to revisit the reward allocation decision, especially considering no explicit reasons were recorded for awarding a lower reward.
The case opens up the critical discussion on the transparency of reward policies for whistleblowers. The court’s stance emphasizes the importance of due process and reasoning in decision-making, ensuring that rights are respected, and fair treatment is provided.
In conclusion, the Ketan Kantilal Modi Vs Union of India & Others case serves as a notable precedent emphasizing due process, and the necessity for transparent decision-making, especially in cases involving rewards for whistleblowers. The Supreme Court’s direction for reconsideration of the reward granted is a significant move that upholds the spirit of justice and fairness. With the committee given six months for reassessment, it remains to be seen whether Modi’s reward will be adjusted to reflect the full 20% he initially expected.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
