Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Rahul Chaudhary Vs Andhra Bank and Ors. (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P.(C) 657/2020 & CM APPL. 1851/2020
Date of Judgement/Order : 17/01/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Rahul Chaudhary Vs Andhra Bank and Ors. (Delhi High Court)

The insertion of sub-section (1A) in Section 14 of SARFAESI Act, the only change that has been brought about is that the District Magistrate/CMM has now the discretion to appoint even their subordinate officers as receivers. Pertinently, sub-section (1A) of Section 14 does not bar the appointment of advocates as receivers. The same position obtains vis-à-vis Rule 8(3) of The Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002, which has been cited in the aforementioned judgment of the Bombay High Court.

FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT ORDER / JUDGEMENT

CM APPL. 1852/2020 (Exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031