Case Law Details
Case Name : Rahul Chaudhary Vs Andhra Bank and Ors. (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P.(C) 657/2020 & CM APPL. 1851/2020
Date of Judgement/Order : 17/01/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All High Courts Delhi High Court
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Rahul Chaudhary Vs Andhra Bank and Ors. (Delhi High Court)
The insertion of sub-section (1A) in Section 14 of SARFAESI Act, the only change that has been brought about is that the District Magistrate/CMM has now the discretion to appoint even their subordinate officers as receivers. Pertinently, sub-section (1A) of Section 14 does not bar the appointment of advocates as receivers. The same position obtains vis-à-vis Rule 8(3) of The Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002, which has been cited in the aforementioned judgment of the Bombay High Court.
FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT ORDER / JUDGEMENT
CM APPL. 1852/2020 (Exemption)
1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.