Sumit Grover

Vide General Circular No. 35/2014, Dated 27/08/2014, Ministry of Corporate Affairs has clarified the following issues with respect to the capitalisation of borrowing costs in power  projects:
1) Borrowing costs incurred during extended delay in commencement of commercial production after the plant is otherwise ready, can not be capitalised by virtue of AS-10 & AS-16 issued by ICAI.
2) Other capitalisations should be made unit-wise, instead of project wise, therefore, in case one of the units of the project is ready for commercial production, capitalisation for such unit should be made, irrespective of the fact that construction of other units still continues.
3) AS-10 & AS-16 deals with all types of power projects. It doesn’t differentiate treatment for cost plus projects or competitive bid projects.
Full Text of the Circular is as follows :-

General Circular No. 35/2014

F.No.17/66/2013/CL-V
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS

5th Floor, ‘A’ Wing Shastri Bhawan,
Dr. R.P. Road, New Delhi
Dated: 27th August 2014

To

All Regional Directors,

Online GST Certification Course by TaxGuru & MSME- Click here to Join

All Registrars of Companies,

All Stakeholders.

Subject: Clarification Accounting Standards (AS) 10 – Capitalization of Cost – regarding.

Sir,

Government has received a number of representations seeking clarifications on capitalization of costs in cases of Competitive Bid power projects. The clarifications sought were with regard to capitalization of borrowing costs incurred during extended delay in commercial production for reasons beyond the developer’s control, and whether capitalization of power plant should be unit-wise or project-wise. The matter has been examined in consultation with the Accounting Standards Board (ASB) of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI).

2. Accounting Standards AS-10 and AS-16 prescribe the principles of capitalization of various costs based on the underlying concept that only such expenditure should be capitalized as form a part of the cost of fixed assets which increase the worth of the assets. Cost incurred during the extended delay in commencement of commercial production after the plant is otherwise ready does not increase the worth of fixed assets. Such costs cannot, therefore, be capitalized.

3. Accounting Standard AS 16, inter alia provides guidance with regard to part capitalization where some units of a project are complete. In case one of the units of the project is ready for commercial production and is capable of being used while construction continues for the other units, costs should be capitalized in relation to that part once the part is ready for commercial production.

4. It is further clarified that AS 10 and AS 16 are applicable irrespective of whether the power projects are ‘Cost Plus projects’ or ‘Competitive Bid projects’. This issues with approval of the competent authority.
Yours faithfully
(S.K Verma)
Assistant Director (Policy)
Ph: 23073067

Read Other Articles from CA Sumit Grover

More Under Company Law

Posted Under

Category : Company Law (3440)
Type : Circulars (7512) Notifications/Circulars (30327)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *