Get all latest income tax news, act, article, notification, circulars, instructions, slab on Taxguru.in. Check out excel calculators budget 2017 ITR, black money, tax saving tips, deductions, tax audit on income tax.
Income Tax : Recent Chennai ITAT decisions address unexplained income, underreporting, and penalties under Sections 69A, 68, 270A, and 271. Key...
Income Tax : Explore why the Income Tax Department is disallowing Section 87A rebate on capital gains under the new tax regime, leading to unex...
Income Tax : Learn the financial penalties of TDS/TCS non-compliance, including interest and disallowance. Prevent errors by managing deadlines...
Income Tax : Learn about penalties for misreporting income, late filings, and other violations under the Income Tax Act, 1961, to avoid serious...
Income Tax : Learn about the partition of Hindu Undivided Family (HUF), its legal process, tax implications under Section 171, and the criteria...
Income Tax : A PIL filed in Gujarat HC contests the denial of Section 87A rebate, highlighting unfair demands and confusion among middle-class ...
Income Tax : A PIL filed in Gujarat High Court contests the denial of the Income Tax rebate under Section 87A, impacting middle-class taxpayers...
Income Tax : Over 34 lakh Audit Reports filed on the e-filing portal by October 7, 2024, showing a 4.8% increase from last year, according to t...
Income Tax : ICAI requests CBDT to allow rebate u/s 87A on short-term and long-term capital gains under Sections 111A and 112, citing inconsist...
Income Tax : CBDT forms a committee to review the Income-tax Act and invites public suggestions on simplification and compliance via the e-fili...
Income Tax : Bombay High Court in the case of Shree Sai Baba Sansthan Trust held that anonymous donation received by religious and charitable t...
Income Tax : Delhi High Court held that CIT has rightly held that assessment order was passed without making necessary inquiries and verificati...
Income Tax : Andhra Pradesh High Court held that levy of penalty under section 271D of the Income Tax Act untenable since AO didn’t record an...
Income Tax : Karnataka HC quashes income tax assessment and penalty orders due to non-service of show cause notice (SCN) under Section 148A(b),...
Income Tax : Karnataka HC quashes CBDT order under Section 119(2)(b) and condones 2-hour delay in ITR filing due to genuine hardship. Returns f...
Income Tax : CBDT exempts tax collection at source (TCS) on payments received from the Reserve Bank of India under Section 206C(1F) of the Inco...
Income Tax : CBDT issued Income-tax (Ninth Amendment) Rules 2024, amending tax collection and credit provisions under Section 206C. Effective f...
Income Tax : The Ministry of Finance amends Income Tax Rules with Notification 112/2024, streamlining tax deduction processes and compliance re...
Income Tax : The Income Tax Amendment Rules, effective October 1, 2024, revise Form No. 10A and 10AB for registration under sections 12A and 80...
Income Tax : Learn about the eligibility, rates, forms, and timelines under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2024....
In a civil suit the respondent obtained a decree against his employer the appellant company for a sum which included com- pensation for wrongful termination of his service, arrears of salary, interest and costs of the suit, and then applied for execution of the decree.
Y. Narayana Chetty Vs. ITO (Supreme Court) The notice prescribed by section 148 cannot be regarded as a mere procedural requirement. It is only if the said notice is served on the assessee that the ITO would be justified in taking proceedings against the assessee. If no notice is issued or if the notice issued is shown to be invalid, then the proceedings taken by the ITO would be illegal and void – Y. Narayana Chetty v. ITO [1959] 35 ITR 388 (SC); CIT v. Thayaballi Mulla Jeevaji Kapasi [1967] 66 ITR 147 (SC); CIT v. Kurban Hussain Ibrahimji Mithiborwala [1971] 82 ITR 821 (SC).
Held, that the Income-tax Officer was justified in exercising his powers under s. 35 and rectifying the mistake. As a result of, the legal fiction about the retrospective operation of the Amendment Act, the subsequently inserted proviso must be read as.
The question arising for consideration both in the reference under section 66(2) of the Indian Income-tax Act as well as in W.P. No. 925 of 1955 are identical and relate to the proper rule to be applied for determining the amortisation of films for computing the income, profits and gains of the assessee which is carrying on business as a film distributor. The assessee in the Reference Case No. 27 of 1955 is the petitioner in the writ petition.
In pursuance of the direction of this Court under Section 66(2), Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, in Miscellaneous Civil Case No. 143 of 1950, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Bombay, has submitted the statement of case on the following question of law : “Whether on the material on record the Appellate Tribunal could reasonably come to a finding that the sum of Rs. 8,500 was an income undisclosed sources ?”
An assessment under section 23(3) of the Act cannot be made only on bare suspcion. An assessment so made without disclosing to the assessee the information supplied by the departmental representative and without giving any opportunity to the assessee to rebut the information so supplied and declining to take into consideration all materials which the assesses wanted to produce in support of his case constitutes a violation of the fundamental rules of justice and calls for the powers under Art. 136 of the Constitution.
CIT v. S Sen & Others (Orissa High Court) 17 ITR 355 (Orissa) The proceeding arises out of two application consolidated because of the facts being identical, by the Commissioner of Income-tax/Excess profits Tax, Bihar and Orissa, under Section 66(1) of the Income-tax Act read with Section 21 of the Excess profits tax Act for the stating a case and a case stated for the opinion of this Court on the following three question of law :-
