Income Tax judiciary-2

HC sets Aside GST AARA Order denying ITC on ‘Cash Carry’ Vehicles

C.M.S. Info Systems Ltd. Vs Commissioner, CGST (Bombay High Court)

C.M.S. Info Systems Ltd. Vs Commissioner, CGST, Mumbai East & Ors. (Bombay High Court) We find that the fundamental submission of the petitioner before the AARA was the fact that money would stand covered by the definition of ‘goods’ under Section 2(52) of the GST Act so long as the same is not used as […]...

Read More

Subsidy received under TUF Scheme is Capital Receipt

M/s Deepak Spinners Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata)

M/s Deepak Spinners Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) We note that the issue under consideration whether the subsidy received under TUF scheme is a capital receipt or revenue receipt. The ld. CIT(A) treated it as part of fixed assets and held that said subsidy should be reduced from the cost of fixed assets. Held by […]...

Read More

Cancer Treatment is reasonable cause for delay in Appeal Filing: ITAT

Shri Pradipta Kumar Das Vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (ITAT Chennai)

Assessee was diagnosed with Cancer in December, 2017 and the ld. CIT(A) passed the order on 20.03.2018, which is subsequent to the diagnosis of the illness, needless to mention that treatment of cancer is very painful and it is not possible to focus on other issues when he was under the treatment and therefore in our opinion, there is a r...

Read More

Landmark Judgment: Benami Amendment Act, 2016 not applicable from retrospective effect: HC

Niharika Jain W/o Shri Andesh Jain Vs Union of India (Rajasthan High Court)

Court has no hesitation to hold that the Benami Amendment Act, 2016, amending the Principal Benami Act, 1988, enacted w.e.f. 1st November, 2016, i.e. the date determined by the Central Government in its wisdom for its enforcement; cannot have retrospective effect....

Read More

MA is maintainable only if appeal is pending and not admitted

Shri Ratanlal C. Bafna Vs JCIT (ITAT Pune)

Shri Ratanlal C. Bafna Vs JCIT (ITAT Pune) When appeal has been filed before the Hon’ble High Court, the appeal is admitted and substantial question of law has been framed in the said appeal, then the Tribunal cannot recall the order. In the present case since the appeal against the order of the Tribunal has […]...

Read More

Depreciation on Office Premises assessed as House Property Income?

Shri Prashant Jayantilal Patel Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)

Shri Prashant Jayantilal Patel Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) The sole subject matter of present appeal is to adjudicate whether the assessee would be eligible to claim depreciation on certain premises, which although forms part of block of assets,has been let out during the impugned AY & earned certain rental income which has been assessed as...

Read More

Income Tax Refund cannot be withheld for error in Computer System

M/s. Vodafone Idea Limited Vs DCIT (TDS) & Ors. (Bombay High Court)

High Court held that Income Tax Refund cannot be withheld by Income Tax Department for error in Computer System. It held that the computer system cannot override the factual aspects and if Income Tax refund is payable than whether the computer systems accepts or not, is of no consequence....

Read More

Non-compete rights are Intangible asset eligible for depreciation: HC

Pr. CIT Vs Piramal Glass Limited (Bombay High Court)

Section 32(1)(ii) Rights acquired by the assessee under the said agreement not only give enduring benefit, protected the assessee's business against competence, that too from a person who had closely worked with the assessee in the same business. The expression 'or any other business or commercial rights of similar nature' used in Explana...

Read More

Non-charging of interest on loan to director – Perquisite?

DCIT Vs Shri Shekhar G. Patel (ITAT Ahmedabad)

Non-charging of interest on the loan amount given by lending company to its director could not be a perquisite as no remuneration or salary in the capacity of the director had been drawn from the lending company nor any interest expenditure was shown in its profit and loss account....

Read More

Registration u/s 12AA cannot be denied for non-application of income for charitable purposes

Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidyalaya Vs CIT (Exemption) (ITAT Indore)

Since objects of assessee were duly charitable in nature and there was no dispute as to genuineness of its activities, therefore,  no registration could be denied under section 12AA merely on the basis that assessee was not carrying out activities for charitable purposes....

Read More

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (4,178)
Company Law (4,836)
Custom Duty (7,323)
DGFT (3,955)
Excise Duty (4,224)
Fema / RBI (3,779)
Finance (3,954)
Income Tax (30,256)
SEBI (3,149)
Service Tax (3,460)