Excise Duty judiciary-2

Toothbrushes supplied free with toothpaste cannot be valued U/s. 4A for excise

M/s Contemporary Targett Pvt Ltd Vs C.C.E. & S.T.-Vadodara-I (CESTAT Ahmedabad)

M/s Contemporary Targett Pvt Ltd Vs C.C.E. & S.T.-Vadodara-I (CESTAT Ahmedabad) Facts is not under dispute that the tooth brushes manufactured and supplied by the appellant were cleared either in bulk form or combo pack or in naked condition that means without any retail packing. Goods were supplied to tooth paste manufacturer who in ...

Read More

Bagasse not a manufactured product- Allahabad HC quashes CBIC Circular

M/s. Balrampur Chini Mills Ltd Vs Union of India (Allahabad High Court)

M/s. Balrampur Chini Mills Ltd Vs Union of India (Allahabad High Court)  Allahabad High Court has held that Cenvat credit need not be reversed in respect of bagasse which is an agricultural waste and not a manufactured final produ The High Court quashed CBIC Circular No.1027/15/2016-CX, dated 25-4-2016 which treated bagasse as exempted p...

Read More

Interest payable on differential duty payable due to retrospective price escalation

M/s. Steel Authority of India Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (Supreme Court)

M/s. Steel Authority of India Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (Supreme Court) Larger Bench of Supreme Court has held that interest for delayed payment of Central Excise duty is liable to be paid on the differential excise duty payable due to retrospective price escala Earlier, doubting the correctness of the Supreme Court decision ...

Read More

FOC material supplied by service recipient should be included in gross works contract value

M/s ABL Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (Supreme Court)

It is also observed that they did not disclose the value of the free supply material in their ST-3 returns. This is not the case where the issue was under litigation or there is any interpretation of law involved for the reason that all the judgments relied upon by the appellant are on different facts and as per the Works Contract Rules, ...

Read More

Dharmada cannot be included in transaction value of goods: SC

M/s D.J. Malpani Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Nashik (Supreme Court of India) Civil Appeal No. 5282 of 2005

When an amount was paid as Dharmada along with the sale price of goods, such payment was not made in consideration of the transfer of goods but for charity, therefore, the same did not form part of the income of assessee and could not be included in the transaction value or assessable value of the goods...

Read More
Posted Under: Excise Duty |

CESTAT expresses serious concern on communications to appellants citing Asian Resurfacing case

Vijayanagar Sugars Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax (CESTAT Bangalore)

Vijayanagar Sugars Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs And Service Tax (CESTAT Bangalore) These applications of M/s Wellcast Steels Ltd, M/s Vijayanagar Sugars Pvt Ltd and of Shri R Rajendra Kumar under section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944, read with section 35C(2A) of Central Excise Act, 1944 and with rule 41 of [&helli...

Read More

Service Tax on Insurance policies taken for compliance under labour legislations- Cenvat Credit eligible

Nelcast Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of GST & Central Excise  (CESTAT Chennai)

Nelcast Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of GST & Central Excise  (CESTAT Chennai) The issue is whether the appellants are eligible for availing the credit on the service tax on premium paid for insurance policies which are in the nature of group insurance and personal accident insurance. The original authority has discussed the provisions u/s....

Read More

ITC allowed on GTA services in case of FOR sale

M/s Ultratech Cement Ltd. Vs C.C.E. Kutch (Gandhidham) (CESTAT Ahmedabad)

M/s Ultratech Cement Ltd. Vs C.C.E. Kutch (Gandhidham) (CESTAT Ahmedabad) We find that the Chartered/ Cost Accountant has certified that the goods were sold on FOR basis by the Appellant and the freight/ damages in transit was responsibility of Appellant till the goods reaches the doorstep of the Customers. Also we find that the consignme...

Read More

Refund of excess duty paid cannot be denied on basis of not reassessing bill of entries

Micromax  Informatics Limited Vs Union of India (Bombay High Court )

Refund applications could not be denied merely because the assessment orders were not challenged by assessee or reassessment of the bill of entries was not done...

Read More

Cenvat Credit of Service Tax paid on Rent of Infrastructural Facilities allowable

M/s Honda Motorcycle & Scooter Vs CCE & ST (CESTAT Delhi)

M/s Honda Motorcycle & Scooter Vs CCE & ST (CESTAT Delhi) Conclusion: Cenvat credit is allowable on service tax paid on rent of infrastructural facilities as common facilities availed by assessee on rent basis were in ‘relation to the manufacture of goods’ and an integral part of the overall activity of manufacturing. ...

Read More

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (4,153)
Company Law (4,744)
Custom Duty (7,289)
DGFT (3,932)
Excise Duty (4,195)
Fema / RBI (3,699)
Finance (3,896)
Income Tax (29,941)
SEBI (3,137)
Service Tax (3,452)