whether rejection of approval u/s 10(23C) on the allegation of institution existing not solely for the purpose of education but for the purpose of profit is justified in law?
Omni Active Health Technologies Ltd Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) The issue under consideration is whether the deduction u/s 35(2AB) towards research and development expenditure claimed by assessee is justified in law? In present case, the assessee claimed deduction u/s 35(2AB) being 200% of amount incurred towards scientific research. The perusal of approvals from DSIR in […]
Month is to be interpreted as period of 30 days and not British calendar for levying additional interest u/s 201(1A) for late payment of TDS?
The issue under consideration is whether AO is correct in treating unsecured loan received by assessee as unexplained credit under section 68?
High Court states that if the Assessing Officer had no jurisdiction to initiate re- assessment proceeding, the mere fact that subsequent orders have been passed would not render the challenge to jurisdiction infructuous. If the very basis for re- opening assessment does not survive, orders on such re-opening would not survive too. Hence, considering the matter in its entirety HC are of the view that the impugned notice under Section 148 of the Act issued by AO cannot be sustained.
Passport is not a commodity: No complaint under consumer Act for Delay in Issuance of Passport.
The issue under consideration is to seeking permission to electronically upload form TRAN-I in order to avail credit of excess VAT reflected in Returns, as due to technical glitches on the GST Portal, the petitioner could not file Form TRAN-I.
whether the AO is correct in chargeing capital gain in the hands of assessee irrespective of the fact that the full consideration not received by the assessee?
The issue under consideration is whether the addition made by AO under section 68 in respect of the deposit of business of wife in their joint bank account is justified in law?
The issue under consideration is that Whether the receipts of the assessees from transponder is royalty under the Income Tax Act, 1961, and if the answer is in the affirmative, whether it is taxable?
