Explore the pivotal case of Devkripa Textile Mills vs ACIT (ITAT Jodhpur) where the court addressed disallowances on director’s remuneration, depreciation, and expenses, offering insights for tax compliance.
Order against Violation of Section 189 read with Section 188 of the Companies Act, 2013 by M/s. Adani Power Limited- The order states that an inquiry was conducted by the Office of the Registrar of Companies, Ahmedabad, based on a directive from the Ministry of Corporate Affairs. During the inquiry, it was found that the company […]
HC held that Section 50 of the GST Act can be applied demanding interest only in cases of belated cash payment towards GST, but not on input tax credit available all the while with the department to the credit of the assessee.
Facts regarding non payment of duty by the appellant or in other words the amount retained of sales tax collected from the customer, came to the notice of the Department only through the audit of the records conducted by the Audit Officer.
Alleged interest income is from the Fixed Deposits, which were made by the assessee in the course of business and in order to comply the statutory requirements of the West Bengal Cooperative Societies Act, 2006. Therefore, the same should be treated as part of the business income and is eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act and should not be treated as income from other sources.
Compounded rubber formulation 1 (with less than 5 parts of Carbon Black) mentioned in para 5.1 merits classification under CTH 4005 1000 Compounded rubber, unvulcanised, in primary forms or in plates, sheets or strip – compounded with carbon black or silica and is eligible for duty exemption benefit under serial number 503
Read the detailed analysis of the ITAT Kolkata’s ruling in the case of Community For Social Work vs. ITO, highlighting jurisdictional discrepancies in the assessment process under the Income-tax Act.
Learn how ITAT Delhi’s ruling favored Manoj Mediratta in a capital gain assessment case, setting aside the addition made by the assessing authority and remanding the issue for fresh consideration.
Discover how CESTAT Delhi’s ruling favored Pine Laminates Pvt. Limited, allowing their refund claim under section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, challenging rejection based on time limitation.
In the case of DCIT Vs Pravardhan Seeds Pvt. Ltd., ITAT Hyderabad ruled that agricultural activities for seed production qualify for tax exemption under section 10(1) of the Income Tax Act.
