A speculative news story being circulated in some section of media claiming that Attorney General has given opinion in favour of not appealing in the Vodafone Arbitration award is totally incorrect and without any factual basis.
The DC further notes that an IP who is more than 70 years of age cannot make an application for the grant of AFA. Therefore, he could not apply for obtaining grant of AFA and hence, could not hold AFA.
In re Midas Foods (P) Ltd (GST AAR Uttarakhand) (a) Whether Overseas Commission Agent is covered within the definition of the term ‘intermediary’ as provided under section 2(13) of the IGST Act, 2017; Overseas Commission Agent is covered within the definition of the term intermediary’ as provided under section 2(13) of the IGST Act, 2017; […]
Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade Ministry of Commerce and Industry Government of India Consolidated FDI Policy (Effective from October 15, 2020) Government of India Ministry of Commerce Sr Industry Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (FDI Division) Consolidated FDI Policy Circular of 2020 Subject: Consolidated FDI Policy The “Consolidated FDI […]
Barak Valley Cements Ltd Vs Union of India (Gauhati High Court) Petitioners were informed that unless they clear their GSTR-3B return for 02 or more tax periods upto August, 2020, their EWB generation facility will be blocked on the EWB portal. If the petitioner company fails to pay as informed then the EWB portal will […]
Merely pointing out to a source and the source admitting that it has made the payments is not, sufficient to discharge the burden placed on the assessees by Section 68 of the said Act. If this were so, then, it would be sufficient for assessees, to simply persuade some credit- less person or entity to own up having made such huge payments and thereby evade payment of property tax on the specious plea that the Revenue, can always recover the tax from such credit- less source, if possible.
Since assessee had expended the amount well within period of 3 years from the date of sale of original asset, assessee was entitled to proportionate deduction under section 54F though the assessee had not deposited capital gains amount in the Capital Gains Account Scheme within the prescribed time.
Unipro Techno Infrastructure Private Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Chandigarh) The brief facts relating to the issue are that the assessee is primarily engaged in developing / providing Lift Irrigation Scheme/ Lift Water Supply Scheme for different state governments. The assessee claims that the said development work carried out by the assessee falls within the definition […]
Sandeep Goyal Vs Union Of India (Rajsthan High Court) Learned counsel for the respondent has opposed the petitions and has submitted that allegations levelled against the petitioners were serious in nature. After thorough investigation of the case it transpired that accused had created 75 fake firms and had issued GST invoices of taxable value of Rs. […]
DGAP Vs. Smookey Kitchen Foods OPC Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) We have carefully considered the Reports furnished by the DGAP, the contentions of the Respondent, and the other material placed on record. We observe that this case pertains to a franchisee of M/s Subway India Private Limited in Ghaziabad (Uttar Pradesh) who is supplying various food […]
