In re Amazon Seller Services Pvt. Ltd. (CAAR Mumbai) M/s. Amazon Seller Services Pvt. Ltd. (the applicant, hereinafter) had filed 10 applications for advance rulings before the Authority for Advance Rulings, Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax, New Delhi (AAR, hereinafter). These applications were pending at the time of appointment of the Customs Authorities for […]
In re Amazon Seller Services Pvt. Ltd. (CAAR Mumbai) CAAR held that wireless speaker device model no. P5B83L merits classification under heading 8518 and more specifically under subheading 85182100 of the first schedule to the Customs Tariff Act. FULL TEXT OF ORDER OF CUSTOMS AUTHORITY OF ADVANCE RULING, MUMBAI Ruling M/s. Amazon Seller Services Pvt. […]
Merit-cum-Means Assistance (Company Secretaryship Course) Scheme, 1983 is intended to provide financial assistance to the economically needy candidates to enable them to pursue the Company Secretaryship course.
Explore the ITAT Indore’s order on unexplained investment and undisclosed expenditure. Assess the impact of legal nuances on tax implications.
To the extent of the interest earned from investments made by it with any co-operative society, a co-operative society is entitled to deduction of the whole of such income under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act. However, interest earned from investments made in any bank, not being a co-operative society, is not deductible under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act.
Vanderlande Industries Private Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune) A cursory glance at the definition of the term `Royalties’ makes it patent that the hitherto content of para 4 of Article 12 comprising of copyright royalty cases only became subject matter of sub-para (a) of the amended para 4 of Article 12. In addition, para 4(b) […]
Kontoor Brands Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) The issue on merit is regarding allowability of depreciation on intangible assets. On this aspect, the issue is covered by the Tribunal order rendered in the case of DCIT Vs. V.F. Arvind Brands Pvt. Ltd. (supra). Para nos. 12 of this Tribunal order are relevant in this […]
Tata Sons Limited Vs DCIT (Bombay High Court) Bombay High Court find substance in the submission of Mr.Pardiwalla that the case at hand is nothing but an instance of mere change of opinion. A bare perusal of the reasons indicates that the exercise was infuenced by a mere change of opinion. To start with, it […]
CIT Vs Roots Multiclean Ltd. (Madras High Court) It is abundantly clear from sub-section (2) of Section 80IA that an assessee who is eligible to claim deduction u/s 801A has the option to choose the initial/ first year from which it may desire the claim of deduction for ten consecutive years, out of a slab […]
UOI Vs Aps Structures Pvt. Ltd (Delhi High Court) It is well settled that recourse to Section 14 of the A&C Act is not available in respect of any challenge to the arbitrator under Section 12(1) of the A&C Act. Such a recourse is permissible only in the event the arbitrator is ineligible by virtue […]
