Bombay High Court case – Ankita Choksey challenges re-opening notice under Income Tax Act, 1961. Assessing Officer’s jurisdictional challenge discussed.
Total income of winnings from betting (horse racing) of assessee, instead of net income from betting after deduction of business loss, should be brought to tax at the rate of 40% under section 115BB.
In re SPFL Securities Ltd (GST AAAR Uttar Pradesh) The nature of the delayed payment charges are being summarized below for understanding its taxability under the GST law:- Where the client makes delay (i.e. beyond T+1 statutory time limit for payment as per SEBI regulations) in reimbursing the expense (being purchase consideration of the securities […]
Smt. Archana Agrawal Vs DCIT (ITAT Indore) During the course of search gold jewellery was found and seized from the residence and bank locker owned by the assessee. Gold jewellery weighing 2027 gram was found (1127 gram from residence and 900 gram from locker No.12/29). The assessee was unable to explain the source of the […]
Akshay Jain Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) Appeal of the assessee is barred by limitation by 12 days for which the assessee has filed an application for condonation of delay stating that after receiving of the order of the ld. CIT (A) on 22.03.2018, assessee has duly handed over the same to his Chartered Accountant, Shri […]
In re Ramkrishna Forgings Limited (GST AAR Jharkhand) Q.1 Whether the manufacture of tooling kit for further manufacture of forgings is to be treated as a separate supply or it may be said that manufacture of tooling kit is only incidental to the ultimate supply of forgings. Hence, the supply is only that of the […]
ACIT Vs Shri Akshay Rajesh Samdariya (ITAT Pune) The solitary issue raised in the appeal by the Revenue and Cross objections by the assessee is against addition deleted/confirmed on account of bogus purchases. The Assessing Officer in re-assessment proceedings made addition of Rs. 2,78,55,984/- as bogus purchases purportedly made by the assessee. In first appeal […]
E.I. DuPont India P. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) AO had taken the month to be the British calendar month as defined in Section 3(35) of the General Clauses Act and it is only on that premise, he calculated one day in March and two days in May as two full months and calculated interest […]
M/s Arti Adhvariya & Co. Vs C.S.T. (CESTAT Ahmedabad) We find that there is no dispute that the appellant is an individual NRI in USA. During the relevant period this Tribunal has given various judgments wherein it was held that an individual and / or proprietorship concern is not considered as a commcerial concern, therefore, […]
Grundfos Pumpas India Ltd. Vs DCIT (Madras High Court) The appellate authority, after considering the submissions made by the Assessee as well as the detailed note submitted by the Assessee, held that the provision has been made by the Assessee on a scientific basis and it is an ascertained liability. Examining the nature of business […]
