While announcing special open market operations on August 25, 2020 the Reserve Bank stated that it would continue to monitor evolving liquidity and market conditions and take measures as appropriate to ensure orderly functioning of financial markets.
Peeyush Awasthi Vs Sun Infra Services Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) Since no penalty provisions were in existence between the period w.e.f. 01.07.2017 to 30.06.2018 when the Respondent had violated the provisions of Section 171 (1), the penalty prescribed under Section 171 (3A) also cannot be imposed on the Respondent retrospectively. Accordingly, the notice dated 05.07.2019 issued […]
Pawan Kumar Vs S3 Buildwell LLP (NAA) 1. The brief facts of the present case are that the Applicant No. 72 (here-in-after referred to as the DGAP) vide his Report dated 04.06.2019, furnished to this Authority under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017, had submitted that he had […]
Sandeep Kumar Vs Nani Resorts and Floriculture Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) Penalty should not be imposed for violation of the provisions of Section 171(1) during the period from 01.07.2017 to 30.09.2018 as the provisions of Section 171(3A) have come into force from 01.01.2020 and they cannot have retrospective operation. FULL TEXT OF ORDER OF NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING […]
Vasantbhai Bhikabhai Patel Vs Shree Infra (NAA) Central Government vide Notification No. 01/2020- Central Tax dated 01.01.2020 has implemented the provisions of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2019 from 01.01.2020 vide which sub-section 171 (3A) was added in Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 and penalty was proposed to be imposed in the case […]
Ratish Nair Vs Man Realty Ltd. (NAA) In this case Respondent has not passed on the benefit of input tax credit to his buyers w.e.f 01.07.2017 to 30.09.2018 and hence, the Respondent has violated the provisions of Section 171(1) of the CGST Act, 2017. It is also revealed from the perusal of the CGST Act […]
Pranesh Pathak Vs Bhutani International Medicos (NAA) Since, no penalty provisions were in existence between the period w.e.f. 27.07.2018 to 31.03.2018 when the Respondent had violated the provisions of Section 171 (1), the penalty prescribed under Section 171 (3A) cannot be imposed on the Respondent retrospectively. FULL TEXT OF ORDER OF NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING APPELLATE AUTHORITY […]
NAA Order: Respondent violated CGST Act by not passing GST rate reduction benefits. No penalty for violation of Section 171 (1) between 15.11.2017 to 31.03.2018.
Jagadish Advertising Vs Designated Committee (Karnataka High Court) The petitioner in this petition has sought for quashing of the statement issued by the Designated Committee in Form Nos. SVLDRS-2 & SVLDRS-3 and is seeking for a direction to the Designated Committee to accept the declaration made by him in Form No.SVLDRS- 1 as final. In […]
Vivaa Tradecom Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court) The Gujarat High Court quashed the order and the demand notice passed by the respondent authority because of the procedural lapses and remitting the matter back to the respondent authority for fresh hearing. The first writ applicant, M/s Viva Tradecom Pvt. Ltd is a […]
