Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) not sustained in absence of intention to conceal income: ITAT Mumbai

Case Law Details

Case Name
Rohit Chatterji Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2015-16
Advertisement
Rohit Chatterji Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai held that penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act not imposable in absence of wilful intention on the part of the assessee to conceal income since all the errors in original return was rectified vide revised return. Facts- The assessee is an individual residing in Singapore. During the year under consideration, the residential status of the assessee is resident and ordinarily resident. Accordingly, the assessee filed the return of income in India declaring a total income of Rs. 12,05,86,110/- which included 50% of the rental income from th...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *