This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Madras HC Sets Aside Order: GSTR 3B & 2A Discrepancy Disputed
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Nakoda Unique Gold Private Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner (ST) (Madras High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Madras High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Nakoda Unique Gold Private Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner (ST) (Madras High Court)
The case of Nakoda Unique Gold Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner (ST), heard by the Madras High Court, revolves around discrepancies between GSTR 3B returns and auto-populated GSTR 2A. This article delves into the court’s decision to set aside the assessment order due to procedural irregularities and appropriation of tax demand.
The petitioner challenged an assessment order primarily on the grounds of inadequate opportunity to contest the tax demand. A show cause notice issued regarding discrep...



