Lawyers empanelled By Banks were not entitled for reservation under Article 16 for their Appointment
Case Law Details
Case Name : K. Marimuthu Vs Secretary to Government (Madras High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All High Courts Madras High Court
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
K. Marimuthu Vs Secretary to Government (Madras High Court)
Conclusion: Lawyers empanelled by the banks to represent them in cases did not hold a civil post and thus the laws of reservation would not be attracted during their appointment. In the absence of any constitutional or statutory mandate providing for reservation, it would not be possible for the courts to issue writs directing the banks to provide for reservation and/or representation to the members of SC/ST/OBC communities in empanelment of lawyers. The prevailing procedures being adopted by the Banks for empanelment of Lawyers were ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

