This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Assessee not entitled to avail remedy under writ petition when detailed order is passed by Revenue Department
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Peter Tyres Vs Assistant Commissioner of CGST & Excise (Madras High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Madras High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Assessee not entitled to avail remedy under writ petition when detailed order is passed by Revenue Department
Peter Tyres Vs Assistant Commissioner of CGST & Excise (Madras High Court)
The Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of Peter Tyres v. Assistant Commissioner of CGST & Excise [Writ Petition No. 73 of 2024 dated January 5, 2024] dismissed the writ petition as the Hon’ble High Cout is not inclined to exercise discretionary jurisdiction and entertain the writ petition as due to availability of statutory remedy with the Petitioner.
Facts:
Peter Tyres (“the Petitioner”) has ...



